CAJ | 학술논문

运用情景模拟和角色扮演的方法，研究大学生对网瘾和作弊的责任归因结构及其应对策略。对416名被试的研究结果显示：（1）责任归因的心理结构是一个“责任推断→责任情感→责任行为”的一元结构模式。（2）我国大学生的责任推断过程与维纳的经典理论基本一致，但在行为应对策略上存在一定的文化差异。（3）大学生对网瘾和作弊的责任推断倾向明显并与情感体验基本保持一致，但与行为应对策略存在一定的冲突。（4）大学生在网瘾和作弊的责任推断、情感体验以及应对策略上存在一定差异。
운용정경모의화각색분연적방법，연구대학생대망은화작폐적책임귀인결구급기응대책략。대416명피시적연구결과현시：（1）책임귀인적심리결구시일개“책임추단→책임정감→책임행위”적일원결구모식。（2）아국대학생적책임추단과정여유납적경전이론기본일치，단재행위응대책략상존재일정적문화차이。（3）대학생대망은화작폐적책임추단경향명현병여정감체험기본보지일치，단여행위응대책략존재일정적충돌。（4）대학생재망은화작폐적책임추단、정감체험이급응대책략상존재일정차이。
Based on Weiner＇s theory ot of responsibility, the present attribution ana juagment study adopted two methods,namely situatlon-simulation and role-play, to analyze the judgment of responsibility and behavioral reaction strategies of Internet Addiction Disorder （IAD） and Cheat in Exams. 416 participators attended this experiment. The results are：（ 1 ） The mental framework of attribution and judgment of responsibility is a one-way operating pattern,that is, responsibility judgment deternlines responsibility emotion, and responsibility emotion in turn determines responsibility conduct. （2）As a whole,the process of responsibility judgment in Chinese college students is consistent with Weiner＇s theory,but there are some culturespecific differences in behavioral reaction strategies. （3） The direction in judgments of responsibility to IAD and Cheat in Exams is explicit, and is consistent with responsibility emotion ,but there are some differences in terms of behavioral reaction strategies. （4）For Chinese college students, IAD is different from Cheat in Exams in responsibility judgment, responsibility emotion and responsibility conduct in a certain extent.