昆明理工大学学报:社会科学版
昆明理工大學學報:社會科學版
곤명리공대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
2008年
9期
52~58
,共null页
犯罪 行政违法行为 福利(效用)最大化 意识形态
犯罪 行政違法行為 福利(效用)最大化 意識形態
범죄 행정위법행위 복리(효용)최대화 의식형태
crime; administrative offense ; welfare (utility) maximization; ideology
传统上区分犯罪和行政违法行为的努力多着眼于行为本身,试图从行为的质、量、或质量上做出明确区分,但未达目的。不过如果我们把视角转向决策者,即可观察到预防、报复及公共决策者及其所代言群体的福利最大化是犯罪与行政违法行为的理论界限;同时,在特定法域要注意其他因素的影响,比如意识形态。
傳統上區分犯罪和行政違法行為的努力多著眼于行為本身,試圖從行為的質、量、或質量上做齣明確區分,但未達目的。不過如果我們把視角轉嚮決策者,即可觀察到預防、報複及公共決策者及其所代言群體的福利最大化是犯罪與行政違法行為的理論界限;同時,在特定法域要註意其他因素的影響,比如意識形態。
전통상구분범죄화행정위법행위적노력다착안우행위본신,시도종행위적질、량、혹질량상주출명학구분,단미체목적。불과여과아문파시각전향결책자,즉가관찰도예방、보복급공공결책자급기소대언군체적복리최대화시범죄여행정위법행위적이론계한;동시,재특정법역요주의기타인소적영향,비여의식형태。
Traditional efforts on differentiation between crime and administrative offense were focused on acts, and scholars tried to differentiate by quality, quantity, or both quality and quantity of acts, but failed. If we try to deal this issue by focusing on policy -maker, we can conclude that the maximum line of welfare (utility), of prevention, retaliation, and interests, which policy - makers seek and represent, is the theoretical boundary. Other factors, such as ideology, may have significant influence in specific circumstances.