南开管理评论
南開管理評論
남개관리평론
Nankai Business Review
2008年
5期
93~101
,共null页
康吧交往 交易成本 信任 互惠原则
康吧交往 交易成本 信任 互惠原則
강파교왕 교역성본 신임 호혜원칙
"Kangba" Exchange; Transaction Cost, Trust, Reci- procity Principle
“康吧”交往是纳西族与傈僳族、藏族之间一种独特而历史悠久的物质交换模式,它不符合理性选择的逻辑却能世代延续至今,同时,不同民族间的“康吧”交往又存在差异。本文借鉴西方主流理论对这种古老的交往模式进行分析,从经济学、社会学、人类学的多重理论角度出发,采用访谈、观察与定量分析相结合的研究方法,对上述现象进行了分析。研究结果表明:(1)资源依赖性、信任和互惠原则对“康吧”交往的延续至关重要;(2)货币市场和投机行为的出现导致“康吧”交往走向衰落,但情感互惠和资源互补使之至今存在;(3)自然资源条件、资源互补程度、社会历史背景和文化因素,对交往模式的差异都有重要影响作用。
“康吧”交往是納西族與傈僳族、藏族之間一種獨特而歷史悠久的物質交換模式,它不符閤理性選擇的邏輯卻能世代延續至今,同時,不同民族間的“康吧”交往又存在差異。本文藉鑒西方主流理論對這種古老的交往模式進行分析,從經濟學、社會學、人類學的多重理論角度齣髮,採用訪談、觀察與定量分析相結閤的研究方法,對上述現象進行瞭分析。研究結果錶明:(1)資源依賴性、信任和互惠原則對“康吧”交往的延續至關重要;(2)貨幣市場和投機行為的齣現導緻“康吧”交往走嚮衰落,但情感互惠和資源互補使之至今存在;(3)自然資源條件、資源互補程度、社會歷史揹景和文化因素,對交往模式的差異都有重要影響作用。
“강파”교왕시납서족여률속족、장족지간일충독특이역사유구적물질교환모식,타불부합이성선택적라집각능세대연속지금,동시,불동민족간적“강파”교왕우존재차이。본문차감서방주류이론대저충고로적교왕모식진행분석,종경제학、사회학、인류학적다중이론각도출발,채용방담、관찰여정량분석상결합적연구방법,대상술현상진행료분석。연구결과표명:(1)자원의뢰성、신임화호혜원칙대“강파”교왕적연속지관중요;(2)화폐시장화투궤행위적출현도치“강파”교왕주향쇠락,단정감호혜화자원호보사지지금존재;(3)자연자원조건、자원호보정도、사회역사배경화문화인소,대교왕모식적차이도유중요영향작용。
"Kangba" exchange is a unique transaction model with a long history among Naxi, Tibetan and Lisu ethnic groups. Though contradicting rational choice theory in economics, it has been passed down from one generation to another to the present day. Also, there are some differences in the exchange model between different ethnic groups. From the perspective of Western mainstream theory, we analyze this ancient exchange model from multiple theoretical perspectives such as economics, sociology and anthropology, using multiple research methods such as face-to- face interview, observation and quantitative analysis. Our research results show that: (1) mutual trust and reciprocity are critical to the maintenance of "Kangba" exchange; (2) the emergence of currency markets and speculative behavior have led to the decline of"Kangba" exchange, while effective reciprocity and complementary resources have sustained it till now; and (3) natural resources, the extent of resource complementarities, as well as socio-historical background and cultural elements have all contributed to greatly influence the differences between their exchange models.t great impact on the exchange difference among different peoples.