CAJ | 학술논문

“归个人使用”是挪用公款罪客观方面的一个必备要件。但是关于这一要件的内涵，在刑法理论界和实务界曾经存在过较大争议。虽然我国对挪用公款罪的规定较为明确，并针对某些具体问题作出了较为详细的解释，但由于现实情况的复杂性和立法的滞后性，在具体的司法实践中对法条和司法解释的使用和解释还是大有商榷余地的。在某些具体的案例中如果不进行严密的推理就极易在定罪上产生偏差，其结果就是相关法益得不到立法所期望的保护。
“귀개인사용”시나용공관죄객관방면적일개필비요건。단시관우저일요건적내함，재형법이론계화실무계증경존재과교대쟁의。수연아국대나용공관죄적규정교위명학，병침대모사구체문제작출료교위상세적해석，단유우현실정황적복잡성화입법적체후성，재구체적사법실천중대법조화사법해석적사용화해석환시대유상각여지적。재모사구체적안례중여과불진행엄밀적추리취겁역재정죄상산생편차，기결과취시상관법익득불도입법소기망적보호。
＂ For private use＂ is a necessary objective condition of the crime of misappropriating public funds. But great disputes as to its connotation existed in the criminal theoretical and practical field. Although there are ceear provisions and interpretations for this crime and some specific problems. However, due to the complexity in reality and lay in legislation, there is still room for oliseussing the application of laws and judicial interpretations in judicial practice. For some specific cases,conviction warps are easy to make without sound reasoning, as a result of which, the relevant interests cannot be protected.