法学论坛
法學論罈
법학론단
Legal Forum
2008年
6期
113~118
,共null页
补充责任 无意思联络的数人侵权 侵权法目的 侵权责任功能
補充責任 無意思聯絡的數人侵權 侵權法目的 侵權責任功能
보충책임 무의사련락적수인침권 침권법목적 침권책임공능
Supplementary; plural- party tort without intention communication; objective of the tort law; function of tort liability
经过四年多的实践，人们对安全保障义务人因第三人侵权，应当承担补充赔偿责任的法律规定产生了疑问，认为无论是在法理上还是在司法实务中都存在一定的缺憾。因此建议将安全保障义务人因第三入侵权所承担的责任，界定为无意思联络数人侵权的按份责任，以便更好地体现侵权法的目的和发挥侵权责任的功能。
經過四年多的實踐，人們對安全保障義務人因第三人侵權，應噹承擔補充賠償責任的法律規定產生瞭疑問，認為無論是在法理上還是在司法實務中都存在一定的缺憾。因此建議將安全保障義務人因第三入侵權所承擔的責任，界定為無意思聯絡數人侵權的按份責任，以便更好地體現侵權法的目的和髮揮侵權責任的功能。
경과사년다적실천，인문대안전보장의무인인제삼인침권，응당승담보충배상책임적법률규정산생료의문，인위무론시재법리상환시재사법실무중도존재일정적결감。인차건의장안전보장의무인인제삼입침권소승담적책임，계정위무의사련락수인침권적안빈책임，이편경호지체현침권법적목적화발휘침권책임적공능。
After more than four years＇ practice, people have doubted about the legal provision that the safety-protection obhgor should undertake supplementary infringement liability causing by the tort of a third party. It is regarded that there is a defect in the legal provision logically and theoretically. Therefore it is suggested that the responsibihty of safety- protection obligor causing by the tort of a third party should be defined as the shared liability of joint infringe without consciousness contracting, in order to embody the objective of the tort law and exert function of tort liability preferably.
