CAJ | 학술논문

近年来有关周梅森小说的评论文章显示出一个类似倾向，即认为上世纪90年代中期以后，周梅森实现了创作“转型”。笔者认为这个界说值得商榷。实际上，周梅森前后两个时段的创作存在着内在一致性。不能基于题材分野就将之割裂开来甚至厚此薄彼。本论文结合作家创作谈，从叙事模式、叙事意图、价值理念这三个方面考察比较两大题材系列的文本，来具体阐发上述观点。
근년래유관주매삼소설적평논문장현시출일개유사경향，즉인위상세기90년대중기이후，주매삼실현료창작“전형”。필자인위저개계설치득상각。실제상，주매삼전후량개시단적창작존재착내재일치성。불능기우제재분야취장지할렬개래심지후차박피。본논문결합작가창작담，종서사모식、서사의도、개치이념저삼개방면고찰비교량대제재계렬적문본，래구체천발상술관점。
Most critics about Zhou Meisen＇s novels in recent years have presented a similar tendency --they believed that there was ＂transform＂ on the writer＇s creation after the mid- 90 s. But I think this definition is worth deliberating. In fact, there are a few same intrinsic characteristics in Zhou＇s early and later period creation. So we can＇t separate his creation in terms of the different themes. Based on the writer＇s introduction of his creation, this article tries to elaborat this viewpoint specifically, by comparing the history series with the reality political series texts from three aspects -- narrative style, narrative intention and value idea.