CAJ | 학술논문

我国《产品质量法》中所规定的三个免责条款存在若干问题，本文通过比较法研究，认为我国的产品责任立法或者未来的中国民法典侵权责任法编应该对“最高工艺”抗辨或称“发展风险”抗辩进行适当限制，同时还应该对美国产品责任法上的一些特殊免责抗辩进行合理吸纳。
아국《산품질량법》중소규정적삼개면책조관존재약간문제，본문통과비교법연구，인위아국적산품책임입법혹자미래적중국민법전침권책임법편응해대“최고공예”항변혹칭“발전풍험”항변진행괄당한제，동시환응해대미국산품책임법상적일사특수면책항변진행합리흡납。
The three exoneration clauses in China＇ s Product Quality Law are problematic and therefore should be revised through the adoption of new legislation. On the basis of comparative study, the authors suggest that the future product liability legislation should impose reasonable restrictions on the state - of - the - art defense or the development risk defense, and introduce certain exoneration defenses from US product liability law.