CAJ | 학술논문

学界一致认为庄子的社会观是倒退的，应受到批判。我们认为衡量社会是否进步主要有精神文明和物质文明两大标准。庄子反对以丧失美德为前提的物质文明生活，主张以知识换道德。这一主张虽然不完全正确，但也有许多值得肯定之处。它提醒人类：要汲取历史教训，在尽量不破坏人类美德的前提下去发展物质生产。
학계일치인위장자적사회관시도퇴적，응수도비판。아문인위형량사회시부진보주요유정신문명화물질문명량대표준。장자반대이상실미덕위전제적물질문명생활，주장이지식환도덕。저일주장수연불완전정학，단야유허다치득긍정지처。타제성인류：요급취역사교훈，재진량불파배인류미덕적전제하거발전물질생산。
The academic circle all agree that Zhuangzi＇s social perspectives were retrogressive, and should be criticized. Generally, the spiritual and material civilizations are the two main standards to evaluate whether the society is progressive or not. Zhuangzi opposed the material civilization which based on the immorality, and advocated to exchange knowledge for morality. Although his advocates were not absolutely correct, many valuable points deserve attention. It reminds us that material production should be based on the premise of no devastation to spiritual virtue. d.