CAJ | 학술논문

将天一阁藏《明史稿》与著录为万斯同撰清钞本以及《明史》修撰中产生的其他卷本比对后，初步认定，天一阁藏《明史稿》中墨、朱笔所改内容，符合万斯同信赖《明实录》并倾心焦骇《献征录》的史学思想，该稿具有两个显著特点，反映出万斯同编纂《明史》过程中不同阶段的成果：一是他亲笔誊改的手稿；二是经他编纂的初稿。前者由万斯同本人誊录与删改，属于手稿的性质；后者是《明史》形成过程中分撰稿的综合编纂稿，部分卷首标明“明史卷”若干，“列传”若干，以改定初稿的面貌出现。重要的是，两者具有共同的一点，即万斯同的史料选择、取舍、分合、排列状况，均清晰可见。因此，天一阁藏《明史稿》便具有清修《明史》重要底本的性质，拥有其他卷本《明史》所不具备的独特的文献价值。
장천일각장《명사고》여저록위만사동찬청초본이급《명사》수찬중산생적기타권본비대후，초보인정，천일각장《명사고》중묵、주필소개내용，부합만사동신뢰《명실록》병경심초해《헌정록》적사학사상，해고구유량개현저특점，반영출만사동편찬《명사》과정중불동계단적성과：일시타친필등개적수고；이시경타편찬적초고。전자유만사동본인등록여산개，속우수고적성질；후자시《명사》형성과정중분찬고적종합편찬고，부분권수표명“명사권”약간，“열전”약간，이개정초고적면모출현。중요적시，량자구유공동적일점，즉만사동적사료선택、취사、분합、배렬상황，균청석가견。인차，천일각장《명사고》편구유청수《명사》중요저본적성질，옹유기타권본《명사》소불구비적독특적문헌개치。
It argues the script of Mingshi collected at Tianyi Ge in Ningbo, including its classical presence and the biographies involved, additionally comparing it with the other versions of the Ming History named by WAN Si-tong. It＇ s clear that WAN revised this script based on the original biographies written by other compilers in the Mingshi Guan for the penmanship of the fore part are different from the latter one and it was from WAN. The coherence of historical view of the script and WAN＇ s affirmative approval to Xian Zhenglu by Jiaohong can tell us the ideas for revising were from WAN. This script is not integral, the biographies contained are incomplete too, which can show the script＇s phase character. All these aspects analyzed indicate this script has distinct and prolific literature value.