CAJ | 학술논문

贸易与环境的关系问题一直是人们关注的焦点。运用Antweiler，Copeland和Taylor（2001）的理论模型，实证分析了中国贸易自由化环境效应的主要影响路径，并着重考察了要素禀赋和污染控制成本在贸易自由化对环境变化的结构效应中的作用，结果表明：贸易自由化总体增加了污染排放，贸易的规模效应带来的污染增加超过了技术效应和结构效应引起的污染减少；“污染避难所”假说对于中国并不成立，中国要素禀赋决定的贸易模式使贸易自由化对环境的结构效应为负，即降低了环境污染。
무역여배경적관계문제일직시인문관주적초점。운용Antweiler，Copeland화Taylor（2001）적이론모형，실증분석료중국무역자유화배경효응적주요영향로경，병착중고찰료요소품부화오염공제성본재무역자유화대배경변화적결구효응중적작용，결과표명：무역자유화총체증가료오염배방，무역적규모효응대래적오염증가초과료기술효응화결구효응인기적오염감소；“오염피난소”가설대우중국병불성립，중국요소품부결정적무역모식사무역자유화대배경적결구효응위부，즉강저료배경오염。
The debate over the impact of international trade on environment has generated more heat than light.The pollution haven hypothesis postulates that low-income developing countries will be made dirtier with trade,while the simple factor endowment hypothesis suggests that with trade dirty capital intensive industries should migrate to the relatively capital abundant developed countries. The empirical test in this article based on the two theoties shows that in China trade liberalization have a positive effect on environment. The simple factor endowment hypothesis postulates a more serious impact on environment than Pollution haven hypothesis in our study.