CAJ | 학술논문

在司法领域,政策只能通过法律形式体现,法官的活动只应服从法律,而宽严相济刑事政策具有行政政策的特征,因此这一政策应当是立法政策,不应直接作为具体政策指导司法实践。将宽严相济作为司法政策存在一些弊端,因其不具有执行的标准,且政策的灵活性容易造成为执行政策而执行政策,难以避免权力的干扰。由于政策主体同样存在利益,因此应当有制度的约束,宽严相济刑事政策的样态应当是制度和法律。制度创新的路径选择有自上而下的强制性变迁和自下而上诱致性变迁。宽严相济刑事政策是自上而下制定的,其实施更应注重自下而上的实践探索。
재사법영역,정책지능통과법률형식체현,법관적활동지응복종법률,이관엄상제형사정책구유행정정책적특정,인차저일정책응당시입법정책,불응직접작위구체정책지도사법실천。장관엄상제작위사법정책존재일사폐단,인기불구유집행적표준,차정책적령활성용역조성위집행정책이집행정책,난이피면권력적간우。유우정책주체동양존재이익,인차응당유제도적약속,관엄상제형사정책적양태응당시제도화법률。제도창신적로경선택유자상이하적강제성변천화자하이상유치성변천。관엄상제형사정책시자상이하제정적,기실시경응주중자하이상적실천탐색。
In the field of justice, the policy should be presented in the form of law which directly guides the judges ＇ activities. In fact, the Criminal Policy of Combining Severe Punishment with Leniency possessing the characteristics of administrative policy should be the policy of legislation instead of the specific policy directing the judicial practice. As the policy of justice , the Criminal Policy of Combining Severe Punishment with Leniency will bring forth some disadvantages ： it is difficult to avoid the interference of power because there is no practical standards of implementation; its＇ flexibility easily leads to the simple implementation of the policy itself. Since the subjects of the policy have the same interest, the policy should be bound by the system and be embodied into the system and the law. Institutional innovation has two paths： the mandatory change from top to bottom and bottom- induced change. The Criminal Policy of Combining Severe Panishment with Leniency was drawn up from top to bottom, so its implementation should be mere emphasized on bottom- up exploration.