CAJ | 학술논문

从判定标准的尺度、范畴两方面对生态公益林与高保护价值森林进行比较，分析得出：两者都服务于森林可持续发展，但前者的判定标准从国家层面上制定，属于宏观尺度，后者的判定标准从森林经营单位层面上制定，属于微观尺度；范畴上，两者具有交叉性，两者都涵盖对方的部分森林类型，但不是全部森林类型。将生态公益林与高保护价值森林加以区别，将有利于社会公众及林业工作者更好地认识高保护价值森林，为高保护价值森林类型的判定提供借鉴。
종판정표준적척도、범주량방면대생태공익림여고보호개치삼림진행비교，분석득출：량자도복무우삼림가지속발전，단전자적판정표준종국가층면상제정，속우굉관척도，후자적판정표준종삼림경영단위층면상제정，속우미관척도；범주상，량자구유교차성，량자도함개대방적부분삼림류형，단불시전부삼림류형。장생태공익림여고보호개치삼림가이구별，장유리우사회공음급임업공작자경호지인식고보호개치삼림，위고보호개치삼림류형적판정제공차감。
The paper compared high conservation value forest with non-commercial forest on standard dimension and category, and the results were： they both survived for forest sustainable development. The standard dimension of the former which based on national level was macro-scale, and the latter based on forest management unit was micro-scale. On the category, both were interactive. They both concerned partial forest types, but not all. The distinction of high conservation value forest and non-commercial forest would be helpful for the public and forestry researchers to enlarge knowledge about high conservation value forest, and provide references for the judgment of high conservation value forest.