厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版
廈門大學學報:哲學社會科學版
하문대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Xiamen University(A Quarterly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
2009年
3期
122~128
,共null页
民事诉讼法 再审 新证据
民事訴訟法 再審 新證據
민사소송법 재심 신증거
the civil procedure law, retrial, fresh evidence
2007年修正的新民事诉讼法保留了新证据这一再审事由,但新法对再审新证据的规定含糊不清,造成了实务运作的严重混乱。近来出台的相关司法解释也未能解决此问题。司法制度的终局性要求与再审程序的特殊功能,决定了再审新证据仅能在有限的范围内被认可。再审新证据的合理定位,必须结合我国国情综合考虑各种相关要素。再审新证据的运用,必须遵循重大性、补充性原则,以降低再审程序被频频启动的危险。
2007年脩正的新民事訴訟法保留瞭新證據這一再審事由,但新法對再審新證據的規定含糊不清,造成瞭實務運作的嚴重混亂。近來齣檯的相關司法解釋也未能解決此問題。司法製度的終跼性要求與再審程序的特殊功能,決定瞭再審新證據僅能在有限的範圍內被認可。再審新證據的閤理定位,必鬚結閤我國國情綜閤攷慮各種相關要素。再審新證據的運用,必鬚遵循重大性、補充性原則,以降低再審程序被頻頻啟動的危險。
2007년수정적신민사소송법보류료신증거저일재심사유,단신법대재심신증거적규정함호불청,조성료실무운작적엄중혼란。근래출태적상관사법해석야미능해결차문제。사법제도적종국성요구여재심정서적특수공능,결정료재심신증거부능재유한적범위내피인가。재심신증거적합리정위,필수결합아국국정종합고필각충상관요소。재심신증거적운용,필수준순중대성、보충성원칙,이강저재심정서피빈빈계동적위험。
Fresh evidence is still stipulated as one of the causes for a retrial in the 2007 amendment to the civil procedure law, which is an appropriate legislative decision owing to its consistence with China' s national situation. However, serious confusions in legal practice result from the fuzzy and unclear stipulations on fresh evidence for retrials in the new amendment. New legal interpretations released in recent years have been too weak to solve such problems, This paper argues that fresh evidence should be admissible only within a limited scope due to the finality of legal systems and the special function of retrial procedures. In defining what constitutes legitimate fresh evidence for retrials we should consider various factors comprehensively by drawing on foreign stipulations and combining them with China's national situations. In using fresh evidence for retrials we should stick to the principles of importance and supplement so as to reduce the risk of high-frequency start of retrial procedures.