CAJ | 학술논문

朝鲜学者丁若镛所撰《梅氏书平》一书是专门考辨东晋梅赜所献古文《尚书》真伪问题的一部力作，在古文《尚书》考辨史上占有重要的地位。丁若镛书中首先确立了考辨古文《尚书》的逻辑基点，即重新考证历史上的孔壁古文《尚书》，然后以此逻辑基点来平议东晋梅赜所献二十五篇古文《尚书》的真伪。通过二者的对比研究，丁若镛发现梅赜所献古文《尚书》与孔壁古文《尚书》不仅篇数、篇名不符，而且与之相关的诸多问题亦有出入。丁若镛由此推论，梅赜所献古文《尚书》并非孔壁古文《尚书》。这是丁若镛考辨古文《尚书》的基本理路。
조선학자정약용소찬《매씨서평》일서시전문고변동진매색소헌고문《상서》진위문제적일부력작，재고문《상서》고변사상점유중요적지위。정약용서중수선학립료고변고문《상서》적라집기점，즉중신고증역사상적공벽고문《상서》，연후이차라집기점래평의동진매색소헌이십오편고문《상서》적진위。통과이자적대비연구，정약용발현매색소헌고문《상서》여공벽고문《상서》불부편수、편명불부，이차여지상관적제다문제역유출입。정약용유차추론，매색소헌고문《상서》병비공벽고문《상서》。저시정약용고변고문《상서》적기본리로。
Korean sc by Mei Ze in Eastern Jin holar Ding Ruoyong＇s Mei Shi Shu Ping, a critical study of Gu Wen Shang Shu presented Dynasty, plays an important role in the history of researches of Gu Wen Shang Shu. In his book, Ding establishes the logical footing,which studies on Gu Wen Shang Shu discovered in the Kong＇s wall. On this basis, Ding discusses the authenticity of Mei Ze＇s Gu Wen Shang Shu. Comparing the two Gu Wen Shang Shu, Ding finds out that not only there are many differences between the two such as contents and passages, but also many related issues are not correct. Ding comes to the conclusion that Mei Ze＇s Gu Wen Shang Shu is not real Kong Gu Wen Shang Shu. This is Ding＇s way of his studies of Gu Wen Shang Shu.