CAJ | 학술논문

本文对哈贝马斯“Faktizitat und Geltung”（《事实性与有效性》）一书中的Gehung概念进行了分析。作者首先指出了英、中译本对Geltung概念的误读，认为Facts或“事实”不等于Faktizitat或“事实性”；Norms或“规范”只是Geltung概念的涵义和意义的一部分。其次分析了哈贝马斯Geltung概念的涵义、意义和问题。作者指出了哈贝马斯Geltung概念内部存在的三个层次的矛盾，并认为他的Geltung概念的模糊性在于他的社会与国家之关系的模糊性。最后提出了如何理解法律的有效性问题。作者认为，Geltung概念是事实性、规范性与价值性的统一体。内在于法律本身的事实性与有效性之间的关系并不是对立统一的矛盾关系，而是包含的种属关系。合法性的有效性来源于人类社会某些确定的先在内容（比如人性尊严之类的天赋人权、人类生存的基本公理等）。它们是先于立法的，是“侵犯禁止”的先在条款。
본문대합패마사“Faktizitat und Geltung”（《사실성여유효성》）일서중적Gehung개념진행료분석。작자수선지출료영、중역본대Geltung개념적오독，인위Facts혹“사실”불등우Faktizitat혹“사실성”；Norms혹“규범”지시Geltung개념적함의화의의적일부분。기차분석료합패마사Geltung개념적함의、의의화문제。작자지출료합패마사Geltung개념내부존재적삼개층차적모순，병인위타적Geltung개념적모호성재우타적사회여국가지관계적모호성。최후제출료여하리해법률적유효성문제。작자인위，Geltung개념시사실성、규범성여개치성적통일체。내재우법률본신적사실성여유효성지간적관계병불시대립통일적모순관계，이시포함적충속관계。합법성적유효성래원우인류사회모사학정적선재내용（비여인성존엄지류적천부인권、인류생존적기본공리등）。타문시선우입법적，시“침범금지”적선재조관。
The author analyses the concept of Gehung in＂ Faktizitat and Geltung＂ by Habermas. First of all, the author points out the misunderstandings of the concept of Geltung in British and Chinese translation and thinks that Facts or＂事实＂ does not mean Faktizitzat 或＂事实性＂ and that Norms or＂规范＂ is just a part of the meaning and significance of the concept of Geltung. Second, the author analyese the meaning and significance and issues of Habermas＇ Gehung. The author points out that the existence of the three levels of internal contradictions of Geltung itself. Finally, how to understand the validity of the law. The author thinks that the concept of Geltung is a unity of Faktizitat and Normativeness and Value. The immanent relation between Faktizitat und Geltung of law itself is not the contradictory relation of unity of opposities, but rather included relation between species and genus. The validity of legitimacy is from some identified and inherent contents such as the inherent rights and the basic axiom.