心理科学
心理科學
심이과학
Psychological Science
2009年
3期
764~767
,共null页
积极与消极 框架效应 公平判断
積極與消極 框架效應 公平判斷
적겁여소겁 광가효응 공평판단
Positive versus Negative, Framing Effects, Justice Judgments
本研究采用Turnlolom的概念框架和借鉴Eyal的框架公平原则的方法探讨了框架效应对公平判断的影响。研究揭示(1)在积极的框架方式下,被试在资源分配中认为非平均主义原则(如绩效、能力、努力、需要、工作年限)更公平;但总体上框架效应不显著。(2)被试对公平原则的评价受任务情境的影响。
本研究採用Turnlolom的概唸框架和藉鑒Eyal的框架公平原則的方法探討瞭框架效應對公平判斷的影響。研究揭示(1)在積極的框架方式下,被試在資源分配中認為非平均主義原則(如績效、能力、努力、需要、工作年限)更公平;但總體上框架效應不顯著。(2)被試對公平原則的評價受任務情境的影響。
본연구채용Turnlolom적개념광가화차감Eyal적광가공평원칙적방법탐토료광가효응대공평판단적영향。연구게시(1)재적겁적광가방식하,피시재자원분배중인위비평균주의원칙(여적효、능력、노력、수요、공작년한)경공평;단총체상광가효응불현저。(2)피시대공평원칙적평개수임무정경적영향。
Adopting Turnblom's conceptual frame and Eyal's technique of justice, the research probed into the framing effect on justice judgment. The results showed that(1) participants judged non-egalitarian principles(i, e. merit, ability, effort, need, and tenure) as more fair when allocation of a resource was presented in the positive framing manner, but the framing effect is not significant as a whole. (2) Participants' judgment of the justice principle was affected by task situation.