CAJ | 학술논문

跳出葛兰西的文化思想，受意大利20世纪20、30年代法西斯主义兴起的制约，葛兰西把对“反经济主义”的持续关注作为理解马克思文本的方式之一。他在开展这项工作时提出了五个问题，现今这些问题还能激发人们对于批判性的有机知识分子的寻求吗？这一问题对于马克思主义者和受马克思主义解释方式影响的人来说，是十分重要的。
도출갈란서적문화사상，수의대리20세기20、30년대법서사주의흥기적제약，갈란서파대“반경제주의”적지속관주작위리해마극사문본적방식지일。타재개전저항공작시제출료오개문제，현금저사문제환능격발인문대우비판성적유궤지식분자적심구마？저일문제대우마극사주의자화수마극사주의해석방식영향적인래설，시십분중요적。
Dualisms are an anathema to those forwarding a tripartite philosophy. To regard Gramsci simply as confronting the idea of ＂organic＂ with ＂traditional intellectuals＂ is to do a disservice to his thought. Rather, he distinguishes between traditional, organic and critical organic intellectuals. That latter conception can be further elucidated in relation to five specific difficulties his analysis raised at the time of his articulation of the distinction between these three kinds of in- tellectual. These difficulties were： i） the nature of the consciousness to be raised by the critical organic intellectual＇s activity; ii） the prospect of conformism; ill）the role of such an intellectual to potential addressees; iv） the concept of the intellectual worker; v） the substitution of humanistic, more global cognitive perspectives by specialized disciplines. These five difficulties, originating in Gramsci＇s exploration of the role of the critical organic intellectual, are still very much with us to- day. Two problems arise as a result of presenting Gramsci＇s position in this way.. a） What is the basis of the lack of comprehension in the addressee of the critical organic intellectual＇s activity？ b） How can the standpoint such an intellectual is likely to take, in Marxist terms, arise today？