重庆工商大学学报：社会科学版
重慶工商大學學報：社會科學版
중경공상대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University Social Science Edition
2009年
3期
97~100
,共null页
合同法第64条 利他合同说 非真正利他合同说 宽泛说
閤同法第64條 利他閤同說 非真正利他閤同說 寬汎說
합동법제64조 이타합동설 비진정이타합동설 관범설
Contract Law Article 64 ; Statement of Ahruism Contract;Statement of Not Really Altruism Contract ; General Statement
对我国《合同法》第64条规定性质有利他合同说、非真正利他合同说和宽泛说三种不同解读，通过对上述三种观点的分析得出宽泛说是对《合同法》第64条的最优解释。
對我國《閤同法》第64條規定性質有利他閤同說、非真正利他閤同說和寬汎說三種不同解讀，通過對上述三種觀點的分析得齣寬汎說是對《閤同法》第64條的最優解釋。
대아국《합동법》제64조규정성질유이타합동설、비진정이타합동설화관범설삼충불동해독，통과대상술삼충관점적분석득출관범설시대《합동법》제64조적최우해석。
Bring forward three different opinions on Article 64 of Contract Law of China by discussing a civil case, the three different opinions are Statement of Altruism Contract, Statement of Not Really Altruism Contract and General Statement. By analyzing the above-mentioned points of views, this paper concludes that the General Statement is the best explanation.
