CAJ | 학술논문

无同化的极端语言变革与有同化的极端语言变革是两种相异的语言消亡案例。通过分析研究西方自由主义人士对两种“语言消亡”的相缪反应发现，自由主义者对语言消亡造成的个体身份认同、交流利益与世界文化及语言多样性方面损失的关注并不能帮助我们理解他们在语言保护上倡导的所谓自由正义的追求。对“语言消亡”的研究及理解不应停留在语言变革本身或语言变革的代价上，应追其根由，分析统治与歧视对“语言消亡”的致因作用。
무동화적겁단어언변혁여유동화적겁단어언변혁시량충상이적어언소망안례。통과분석연구서방자유주의인사대량충“어언소망”적상무반응발현，자유주의자대어언소망조성적개체신빈인동、교류이익여세계문화급어언다양성방면손실적관주병불능방조아문리해타문재어언보호상창도적소위자유정의적추구。대“어언소망”적연구급리해불응정류재어언변혁본신혹어언변혁적대개상，응추기근유，분석통치여기시대“어언소망”적치인작용。
Radical linguistic alteration with or without assimilation are two divergent cases of language death. The analyses of liberalists＇ distinct reactions to the two cases indicate that their concern over the costs of identity, communicative interests and diversity and knowledge triggered by language death cannot help understand the so-called liberal pursuit of justice involving language preservation. This paper points out that the study on and the understanding of language change itself and its costs should rest mostly upon their pathway, that is, the causation of domination and discrimination to language death.