心理发展与教育
心理髮展與教育
심리발전여교육
Psychological Development and Education
2009年
3期
61~67
,共null页
黎坚 袁文东 骆方 杜卫
黎堅 袁文東 駱方 杜衛
려견 원문동 락방 두위
心理负荷 元记忆 监测 准确性 偏差
心理負荷 元記憶 鑑測 準確性 偏差
심리부하 원기억 감측 준학성 편차
mental loading; meta-memory ; monitoring ; relative and absolute accuracy; bias
以汉字再认任务为载体,采用两因素被试内设计,考察任务所导致的心理负荷水平,以及学习判断(JOL)和信心判断(JOC)两种监测方式,对元记忆监测效果的影响。对监测效果的衡量分别使用了相对准确性,绝对准确性,以及判断偏差三种指标。结果发现,个体在任务过程中的心理负荷水平会影响其对任务解决过程的监测准确性:心理负荷水平越高,元记忆监测的准确性越低。心理负荷水平还会影响元记忆监测的判断偏差:心理负荷处于中等偏低水平时,监测不容易出现偏差;心理负荷处于中等偏高水平时,个体表现出过高自信;但当心理负荷达到较高水平后,判断偏差消失;随着心理负荷水平继续增大,个体又表现出过低自信。
以漢字再認任務為載體,採用兩因素被試內設計,攷察任務所導緻的心理負荷水平,以及學習判斷(JOL)和信心判斷(JOC)兩種鑑測方式,對元記憶鑑測效果的影響。對鑑測效果的衡量分彆使用瞭相對準確性,絕對準確性,以及判斷偏差三種指標。結果髮現,箇體在任務過程中的心理負荷水平會影響其對任務解決過程的鑑測準確性:心理負荷水平越高,元記憶鑑測的準確性越低。心理負荷水平還會影響元記憶鑑測的判斷偏差:心理負荷處于中等偏低水平時,鑑測不容易齣現偏差;心理負荷處于中等偏高水平時,箇體錶現齣過高自信;但噹心理負荷達到較高水平後,判斷偏差消失;隨著心理負荷水平繼續增大,箇體又錶現齣過低自信。
이한자재인임무위재체,채용량인소피시내설계,고찰임무소도치적심리부하수평,이급학습판단(JOL)화신심판단(JOC)량충감측방식,대원기억감측효과적영향。대감측효과적형량분별사용료상대준학성,절대준학성,이급판단편차삼충지표。결과발현,개체재임무과정중적심리부하수평회영향기대임무해결과정적감측준학성:심리부하수평월고,원기억감측적준학성월저。심리부하수평환회영향원기억감측적판단편차:심리부하처우중등편저수평시,감측불용역출현편차;심리부하처우중등편고수평시,개체표현출과고자신;단당심리부하체도교고수평후,판단편차소실;수착심리부하수평계속증대,개체우표현출과저자신。
The present study was intended to investigate the effect of mental loading on meta-memory monitoring. A Chinese character recalling task was administered to 41 graduate students in order to assess their prospective monitoring and retrospective monitoring. Judgment of leaming (JOL) and judgment of confidence (JOC) were performed before or after the cognitive task. All responses were automatically recorded by the computer, while absolute accuracy, relative accuracy and monitoring bias were calculated as indexes. The SPSS 13.0 software was used for data analysis. The results showed: (1) When using gamma as the index of relative monitoring accuracy, the main effect of mental loading was significant in JOL. The accuracy declined with the increase of mental loading. (2) While using difference score as the index, absolute monitoring accuracy declined with the increase of mental loading both in JOL and JOC, but the main effect was stronger in JOL. (3) The monitoring bias changed from "No bias" to "Over confidence", then to "No bias", and finally to "Under confidence", as the mental loading was increasing gradually.