CAJ | 학술논문

浩然已走完了他的人生途程，但是他和他的《金光大道》所引起的争议和话题并未完结．综观现有的相关研究，不难发现，与语言有关的问题在各阶段的争议中都未被涉及。本文主要通过语言和意识形态、语言和文学价值、作家的个人修辞行为与语言文化共通感三个关系，思考现有研究的局限和存在的问题。
호연이주완료타적인생도정，단시타화타적《금광대도》소인기적쟁의화화제병미완결．종관현유적상관연구，불난발현，여어언유관적문제재각계단적쟁의중도미피섭급。본문주요통과어언화의식형태、어언화문학개치、작가적개인수사행위여어언문화공통감삼개관계，사고현유연구적국한화존재적문제。
Although Hao Ran＇ s life journey has come to an end, controversies on him and his novel Jin Guang Da Dao have not ended yet. In light of relevant studies on Hao Ran in the latest 30 years in China, it is not difficult to find that there exists a phenomenon of ＂ lingustic absence. ＂ By examining the relationship between tanguange and ideology, languange and literary value, and the author＇ s personal rhetoric and the lingual - cultural commonality, this paper aims at revealing the limitations and problems of criticisms on Hao Ran.