河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2009年
9期
105~109
,共null页
商业秘密侵权行为 保密义务 诉讼禁令 举证责任 损害赔偿
商業祕密侵權行為 保密義務 訴訟禁令 舉證責任 損害賠償
상업비밀침권행위 보밀의무 소송금령 거증책임 손해배상
the infringement of the business secret ; the obligation of the keeping secret ; injunction ; burden of evidence ; compensation
我国《反不正当竞争法》将侵害商业秘密的主体限定为“经营者”，显然不敷使用，有必要进行扩张解释；关于商业秘密侵权行为种类的规定过于简单，使得实践当中的许多侵权行为成为漏网之鱼；保密义务有别于竞业禁止义务；侵害商业秘密案件不适用“谁主张，谁举证”原则；侵害商业秘密案件原则上应当设立诉讼禁令制度；关于商业秘密侵权的民事责任应当进一步完善。
我國《反不正噹競爭法》將侵害商業祕密的主體限定為“經營者”，顯然不敷使用，有必要進行擴張解釋；關于商業祕密侵權行為種類的規定過于簡單，使得實踐噹中的許多侵權行為成為漏網之魚；保密義務有彆于競業禁止義務；侵害商業祕密案件不適用“誰主張，誰舉證”原則；侵害商業祕密案件原則上應噹設立訴訟禁令製度；關于商業祕密侵權的民事責任應噹進一步完善。
아국《반불정당경쟁법》장침해상업비밀적주체한정위“경영자”，현연불부사용，유필요진행확장해석；관우상업비밀침권행위충류적규정과우간단，사득실천당중적허다침권행위성위루망지어；보밀의무유별우경업금지의무；침해상업비밀안건불괄용“수주장，수거증”원칙；침해상업비밀안건원칙상응당설립소송금령제도；관우상업비밀침권적민사책임응당진일보완선。
In this article, the author discusses some shortcomings of the Antl-competition law of PRC, and then puts forward some improvements. These are： it is too narrow for Anti-competition Law of PRC to define the infringer of the business secret as ＂the operator of the business （or the manager） ＂, and therefore, it should be enlarged; it is too simple to stipulate the infringement activities of the business secret, and to make some of the infringements of the business secret can not be punished ; it is necessary to classify the differences between the obligation of the keeping secret and the obligation of the anti-competition ; the ＂who claim, who burden the evidence＂ principle is not applied in the case of the infringement of the business secret; the remedy of the injunction should be used in the case of the infringement of the business secret; and the civil obligations which the infringer of the business secret should be perfected.
