环球法律评论
環毬法律評論
배구법률평론
Global Law Review
2009年
4期
61~68
,共null页
环境侵权民事司法 利益衡量 经济效率分析思维
環境侵權民事司法 利益衡量 經濟效率分析思維
배경침권민사사법 이익형량 경제효솔분석사유
布默诉大西洋水泥公司案的判决说明美国环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量具有独特性：广泛运用富含经济效率分析思维的利益衡量来协调个人、环境、社会和经济等多元利益；利益衡量要素趋于完善和清晰；环境侵权民事司法救济的责任形式包括完全排除侵害、部分排除侵害、代替性赔偿、损害赔偿等等。我国在处理环境污染型案件时存在法官应用利益衡量的宏观思维定位不佳、忽视经济效率分析思维的运用等问题。
佈默訴大西洋水泥公司案的判決說明美國環境侵權民事司法中利益衡量具有獨特性：廣汎運用富含經濟效率分析思維的利益衡量來協調箇人、環境、社會和經濟等多元利益；利益衡量要素趨于完善和清晰；環境侵權民事司法救濟的責任形式包括完全排除侵害、部分排除侵害、代替性賠償、損害賠償等等。我國在處理環境汙染型案件時存在法官應用利益衡量的宏觀思維定位不佳、忽視經濟效率分析思維的運用等問題。
포묵소대서양수니공사안적판결설명미국배경침권민사사법중이익형량구유독특성：엄범운용부함경제효솔분석사유적이익형량래협조개인、배경、사회화경제등다원이익；이익형량요소추우완선화청석；배경침권민사사법구제적책임형식포괄완전배제침해、부분배제침해、대체성배상、손해배상등등。아국재처리배경오염형안건시존재법관응용이익형량적굉관사유정위불가、홀시경제효솔분석사유적운용등문제。
This article, through the analysis of the case of Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. , introduces the unique characteristics of the balancing of interests in U.S. judicial practice relating to environmental torts. The U. S. courts, by coordinating individual, environmental, social and economic interests through extensive application of economic efficiency analysis, have gradually clarifled the main elements in the balancing of interests comparison, Chinese judges, in balancing interests and thereby improved the relevant case law. In in cases involving environment pollution, have exhibited many shortcomings, such as inadequate orientation of macroscopic - thinking and ignoring the application of economic efficiency analysis, etc. In view of the above problems and based on the U.S. experience, the author puts forward some suggestions on improvement in this area.
