安徽农业大学学报：社会科学版
安徽農業大學學報：社會科學版
안휘농업대학학보：사회과학판
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University（Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
2009年
4期
51~55
,共null页
责任竞合 法律选择 价值冲突 平衡
責任競閤 法律選擇 價值遲突 平衡
책임경합 법률선택 개치충돌 평형
liability concurrence; choice of law; value conflict; balance
涉外民事责任竞合因其牵涉的双重法律关系及涉外因素而呈现出法律选择上的多元价值的竞逐，不仅表现为法律的确定性与个案适当性的博弈，而且表现为合同的预期价值与弱者利益保护的公正价值上的冲突。区分合同类型和损害类型进行法律选择才是解决价值冲突的应然途径。
涉外民事責任競閤因其牽涉的雙重法律關繫及涉外因素而呈現齣法律選擇上的多元價值的競逐，不僅錶現為法律的確定性與箇案適噹性的博弈，而且錶現為閤同的預期價值與弱者利益保護的公正價值上的遲突。區分閤同類型和損害類型進行法律選擇纔是解決價值遲突的應然途徑。
섭외민사책임경합인기견섭적쌍중법률관계급섭외인소이정현출법률선택상적다원개치적경축，불부표현위법률적학정성여개안괄당성적박혁，이차표현위합동적예기개치여약자이익보호적공정개치상적충돌。구분합동류형화손해류형진행법률선택재시해결개치충돌적응연도경。
Involved in dual legal relations and foreign-related factors, foreign-related civil liability exhibits a kind of multi-value competition in its choice of law, which is manifested not only in the value game between legal certainty and case impartiality, but also in the conflict between the expected value of the contract and fair value of protecting the benefits of the weak. It is argued that to resolve the conflict of value we should distinguish between the type of contract and damage type for the choice of law.
