CAJ | 학술논문

20世纪中叶，证据学研究开始从关注证据规则的领域转向关注证明过程，从而产生“新证据学”。尽管到了20世纪80年代中期，这种新证据学派得到了快速发展，并成为了一项主要的国际运动，它遇到来自各方面的挑战也不断增多。这些挑战表明更广义的新证据学必然形成。它与狭义的新证据学之间的区别不仅表现在“新”的意义不同，还体现在“学”的含义不同；不仅突出创新，还强调其“科学性”。广义新证据学的出现，表明具有综合集成性质的综合性证据科学的形成。
20세기중협，증거학연구개시종관주증거규칙적영역전향관주증명과정，종이산생“신증거학”。진관도료20세기80년대중기，저충신증거학파득도료쾌속발전，병성위료일항주요적국제운동，타우도래자각방면적도전야불단증다。저사도전표명경엄의적신증거학필연형성。타여협의적신증거학지간적구별불부표현재“신”적의의불동，환체현재“학”적함의불동；불부돌출창신，환강조기“과학성”。엄의신증거학적출현，표명구유종합집성성질적종합성증거과학적형성。
In the middle part of the twentieth century, research on evidence began to transform from a field concemed with the articulation of rules to a field concerned with the process of proof. This wave resulted in the establishment of the New Evidence Scholarship. This new species of evidence scholarship had grown substantially and became a major international movement by the mid-1980 s, but it faced many challenges. It showed that a very broader view of the new evidence scholarship should be established. The distinctions between the narrow new evidence scholarship and the broad one embodied not only on the different meaning of the word “New,” but also the implication of “scholarship.” The broad new evidence scholarship incarnated the interdisciplinary trend of evidence scholarship and underlined its “scientific” nature. The central theme of this paper is, to the effect that, the development of the broad new evidence scholarship ultimately leads to the occurrence of a science of evidence which is comprehensive in nature.