CAJ | 학술논문

通过在《证据规定》与《医疗机构管理条例》第33条两者之间建立起有意义的关联，揭示“孕妇死亡”事件背后的制度因素，开启悲剧事件背后的制度性力量，进而指出公共政策进入法律及其实践后所可能出现的扭曲与异化，从而提出法律在面对公共政策时态度必须谨慎，要警惕公共政策进入法律及其实践后的风险，并指出法律在实现公共政策上可以适当地引入市场机制，可以直接由市场调节来选择利益的分配，从而替代仅仅靠立法或行政的资源配置手段。
통과재《증거규정》여《의료궤구관리조례》제33조량자지간건립기유의의적관련，게시“잉부사망”사건배후적제도인소，개계비극사건배후적제도성역량，진이지출공공정책진입법률급기실천후소가능출현적뉴곡여이화，종이제출법률재면대공공정책시태도필수근신，요경척공공정책진입법률급기실천후적풍험，병지출법률재실현공공정책상가이괄당지인입시장궤제，가이직접유시장조절래선택이익적분배，종이체대부부고입법혹행정적자원배치수단。
This paper aims to build association between Evidence Providing Regulation and the 33rd item in Medical Institution Regulations by exposing the systematic elements behind the issue of ＂the pregnant woman＇s death＂. The writer calls for the systematic power behind those tragic events, and points out the possible distortion and dissimilation of the public poliey＇s being applied to law and practice. It is proved in the paper that cautiousness and thoroughness is required when facing the public policy, and risks of its application to law and the practice should be foreseen, and marketing mechanism should be introduced to carry out the public policy. The interest distribution can be chosen under the guide of the market and therefore replaces the former legislated or administrated allocation of resources.