体育学刊
體育學刊
체육학간
Journal of Physical Education
2009年
9期
92~97
,共null页
民族传统体育 武术教育 综述
民族傳統體育 武術教育 綜述
민족전통체육 무술교육 종술
traditional national sports; Wushu education; overview
改革开放30年来,纵观武术教育的发展历程,可以概括为:(1)1978-1989年的武术教育思想大讨论,起到了解放思想、重新认识武术的作用;(2)1990~1999年武术在学校教育中全面推广,期间武术的文化内涵、教学和学科体系的构建成为学界关注的焦点;(3)新世纪伊始,学者们从武术教育的历史入手逐渐过渡到武术的文化教育价值、教育改革、教育体系等方面的研究上来。贯穿这一历程的主线则是武术教育的日益完善与发展。但30年来的武术教育研究却不容乐观:基础理论研究不深入、应用理论研究规模小、研究范式与方法较单一、跨学科与跨领域的研究较其他学科少。研究表明,拓展武术教育研究领域,重视多元化的研究范式与方法将成为未来武术教育研究的趋势。
改革開放30年來,縱觀武術教育的髮展歷程,可以概括為:(1)1978-1989年的武術教育思想大討論,起到瞭解放思想、重新認識武術的作用;(2)1990~1999年武術在學校教育中全麵推廣,期間武術的文化內涵、教學和學科體繫的構建成為學界關註的焦點;(3)新世紀伊始,學者們從武術教育的歷史入手逐漸過渡到武術的文化教育價值、教育改革、教育體繫等方麵的研究上來。貫穿這一歷程的主線則是武術教育的日益完善與髮展。但30年來的武術教育研究卻不容樂觀:基礎理論研究不深入、應用理論研究規模小、研究範式與方法較單一、跨學科與跨領域的研究較其他學科少。研究錶明,拓展武術教育研究領域,重視多元化的研究範式與方法將成為未來武術教育研究的趨勢。
개혁개방30년래,종관무술교육적발전역정,가이개괄위:(1)1978-1989년적무술교육사상대토론,기도료해방사상、중신인식무술적작용;(2)1990~1999년무술재학교교육중전면추엄,기간무술적문화내함、교학화학과체계적구건성위학계관주적초점;(3)신세기이시,학자문종무술교육적역사입수축점과도도무술적문화교육개치、교육개혁、교육체계등방면적연구상래。관천저일역정적주선칙시무술교육적일익완선여발전。단30년래적무술교육연구각불용악관:기출이론연구불심입、응용이론연구규모소、연구범식여방법교단일、과학과여과영역적연구교기타학과소。연구표명,탁전무술교육연구영역,중시다원화적연구범식여방법장성위미래무술교육연구적추세。
The course of development of Wushu education in 30 years of reform and opening can be in general divided into the following periods: 1) 1978-1989: extensive discussion about the ideology for Wushu education, which played a role in freeing our minds and retrospecting Wushu; 2) 1990-1999: comprehensive popularization of Wushu in scholastic education, in this period the cultural connotation and teaching of Wushu as well as the establishment of the disciplinary system of Wushu had become the focal point of attention of the academic community; 3) since the beginning of the new century, scholars have gradually shifted their attention from the study of the history of Wushu education to the study of the cultural and educational values, educational reform and educational system of Wushu. It is the ever increasing perfection and development of Wushu education that went through such a course of development. However, for the following reasons we are not optimistic about the study of Wushu education in 30 years: the study of basic theories is not profound; the scale of the study of application theories is small; the research forms and methods are undiversified; the trans-discipline and trans-area researches are less than other disciplines. Via their study the authors concluded that expanding the range of study of Wushu education and focusing on diversified research forms and methods will be come a new trend for the study of Wushu education in the future.