证券市场导报
證券市場導報
증권시장도보
Securities Market Herald
2009年
10期
52~60
,共null页
跨境双重上市 海外上市 投资效率 A+H公司
跨境雙重上市 海外上市 投資效率 A+H公司
과경쌍중상시 해외상시 투자효솔 A+H공사
Cross-Border Dual-Listings, Overseas Listing, Investment Efficiency, A&H Company
本文利用我国上市公司1993~2007年的9813个样本数据,采用数据包络分析方法探讨跨境双重上市能否提高公司的投资效率。研究结果表明,在A+H双重上市公司所涉及的九个行业中,制造业、电煤水业、信息技术业、银行保险业、房地产业、社会服务业的A+H公司的投资效率优于行业平均水平,占2007年底51家A+H公司的68.6%;但果掘业、建筑业、交通运输业的A+H公司的投资效率低于行业平均水平,占2007年底51家A+H公司的31.4%。大部分A+H公司的规模效率小于1但规模报酬递增,DEA表明这些公司应该继续扩大规模。大部分行业的上市公司(包括A+H公司)的效率均值都逼近或超过0.9,但各行业公司间的效率值比较接近。
本文利用我國上市公司1993~2007年的9813箇樣本數據,採用數據包絡分析方法探討跨境雙重上市能否提高公司的投資效率。研究結果錶明,在A+H雙重上市公司所涉及的九箇行業中,製造業、電煤水業、信息技術業、銀行保險業、房地產業、社會服務業的A+H公司的投資效率優于行業平均水平,佔2007年底51傢A+H公司的68.6%;但果掘業、建築業、交通運輸業的A+H公司的投資效率低于行業平均水平,佔2007年底51傢A+H公司的31.4%。大部分A+H公司的規模效率小于1但規模報酬遞增,DEA錶明這些公司應該繼續擴大規模。大部分行業的上市公司(包括A+H公司)的效率均值都逼近或超過0.9,但各行業公司間的效率值比較接近。
본문이용아국상시공사1993~2007년적9813개양본수거,채용수거포락분석방법탐토과경쌍중상시능부제고공사적투자효솔。연구결과표명,재A+H쌍중상시공사소섭급적구개행업중,제조업、전매수업、신식기술업、은행보험업、방지산업、사회복무업적A+H공사적투자효솔우우행업평균수평,점2007년저51가A+H공사적68.6%;단과굴업、건축업、교통운수업적A+H공사적투자효솔저우행업평균수평,점2007년저51가A+H공사적31.4%。대부분A+H공사적규모효솔소우1단규모보수체증,DEA표명저사공사응해계속확대규모。대부분행업적상시공사(포괄A+H공사)적효솔균치도핍근혹초과0.9,단각행업공사간적효솔치비교접근。
Using the method of data envelopment analysis, we studied the data of 9813 listed companies in China from 1993 to 2007 to discuss whether cross-border dual listings can improve corporate investment efficiency. The results show that, in the nine industries concerned in A&H dual-listing, the average investment efficiency of the A&H companies belonging to the industries of manufacturing, electricity & water & coal, information technology, banking and insurance, real estate, social services, is higher than the corresponding industrial average level. The number of these A&H companies account 68.6% of all the A&H companies at the end of 2007 (51 companies). However, the average investment efficiency of the A&H companies belonging to the industries of excavating, construction, transportation, is lower than the corresponding industrial average level. The number of these A&H companies account 31.4% of all the A&H companies at the end of 2007 (51 companies). Furthermore, the scale efficiency of most A&H companies is less than 1 and the return to scale is increasing, which means that these companies should expand their scale. The average efficiency values of most industries (including A&H companies) vary around 0.9, but average efficiency values of all the companies (including A&H companies) in each industry are very adjacent.