CAJ | 학술논문

自威尔逊以来关于政治-行政二分法争论的意义在于，划清政治与行政的界线以便为公共行政学寻找赖以存在的基础。从争论的过程看，政治与行政的划分并不能有效实现，因此不能很好地为公共行政学提供理论基础。政治学研究中的政治管理似乎是公共行政的核心内容，这是政治学与管理学的交叉研究领域。因此，合理的推论应该是，公共行政学应该是政治学与管理学的交叉学科。所以，公共行政学在理论基础似乎不是从政治-行政二分法中寻找，不是从其与政治学的决裂中寻找，而应从政治学与管理学的结合中寻找。
자위이손이래관우정치-행정이분법쟁론적의의재우，화청정치여행정적계선이편위공공행정학심조뢰이존재적기출。종쟁론적과정간，정치여행정적화분병불능유효실현，인차불능흔호지위공공행정학제공이론기출。정치학연구중적정치관리사호시공공행정적핵심내용，저시정치학여관이학적교차연구영역。인차，합리적추론응해시，공공행정학응해시정치학여관이학적교차학과。소이，공공행정학재이론기출사호불시종정치-행정이분법중심조，불시종기여정치학적결렬중심조，이응종정치학여관이학적결합중심조。
The controversy about politics-administration dichotomy arising from Wilson has deep meaning, which is to make a distinction between politics and administration so as to find the foundation of public administration. Viewed from the process of the controversy, the distinction of politics and administration can＇t be effectively completed, so that the theoretical foundation of public administration can＇t be provided by this means. Political management studied by political theory is probably the core of public administration, which is the crossing domain of politics and management. Then, we can conclude that public administration is the crossing discipline between politics and management. So the theoretical foundation of public administration shouldn＇t be looked for from the politics-administration dichotomy, that＇s to say, from the breakdown between public administration and politics. We should look for the theoretical foundation for public administration from the integration between politics and management.