旅游学刊
旅遊學刊
여유학간
Tourism Tribune
2009年
11期
41~46
,共null页
祁秋寅 张捷 杨旸 卢韶婧 张宏磊
祁鞦寅 張捷 楊旸 盧韶婧 張宏磊
기추인 장첩 양양 로소청 장굉뢰
游客环境态度 环境行为倾向 结构方程模型 九寨沟
遊客環境態度 環境行為傾嚮 結構方程模型 九寨溝
유객배경태도 배경행위경향 결구방정모형 구채구
tourist environmental attitude; environmental behavior intention ; structural equation model; Jiuzhaigou
基于国内外相关理论与实证研究,本文以九寨沟为案例地,构建结构方程模型探讨自然遗产地游客环境态度与环境行为倾向之间的影响机制。通过探索性因子分析发现游客的环境态度可以进一步细分为4个维度:即环境情感、环境责任、环境知识和环境道德。通过验证性因子分析和结构方程模型,本研究进一步分析了案例地游客环境态度与环境行为倾向的关系。模型估计结果显示,环境态度中的环境情感维度和环境知识维度对环境行为倾向具有显著的、正向的影响;环境道德维度对环境行为倾向影响较小,而环境责任维度与行为倾向没有显著关系。最后,本文对模型分析的结论进行了总结和归纳。
基于國內外相關理論與實證研究,本文以九寨溝為案例地,構建結構方程模型探討自然遺產地遊客環境態度與環境行為傾嚮之間的影響機製。通過探索性因子分析髮現遊客的環境態度可以進一步細分為4箇維度:即環境情感、環境責任、環境知識和環境道德。通過驗證性因子分析和結構方程模型,本研究進一步分析瞭案例地遊客環境態度與環境行為傾嚮的關繫。模型估計結果顯示,環境態度中的環境情感維度和環境知識維度對環境行為傾嚮具有顯著的、正嚮的影響;環境道德維度對環境行為傾嚮影響較小,而環境責任維度與行為傾嚮沒有顯著關繫。最後,本文對模型分析的結論進行瞭總結和歸納。
기우국내외상관이론여실증연구,본문이구채구위안례지,구건결구방정모형탐토자연유산지유객배경태도여배경행위경향지간적영향궤제。통과탐색성인자분석발현유객적배경태도가이진일보세분위4개유도:즉배경정감、배경책임、배경지식화배경도덕。통과험증성인자분석화결구방정모형,본연구진일보분석료안례지유객배경태도여배경행위경향적관계。모형고계결과현시,배경태도중적배경정감유도화배경지식유도대배경행위경향구유현저적、정향적영향;배경도덕유도대배경행위경향영향교소,이배경책임유도여행위경향몰유현저관계。최후,본문대모형분석적결론진행료총결화귀납。
Based on relevant theories and empirical studies both at home and abroad, the paper, taking Jiuzhaigou as a case, constructs structural equation model (SEM) to explore potential relationship of tourists' environmental attitudes and behavior in natural heritage site. Through exploratory factor analysis, we find that tourists' environmental attitudes can be further categorized into four dimensions, namely, environmental sentiment, environmental responsibility, environmental knowledge and environmental morality. Furthermore, as indicated by the verified factor analysis and SEM, the study analyzes the relationship between tourists' environmental attitudes and environmental behavior intention. The result of model estimation shows that environmental sentiment and environmental knowledge have significant and positive impact on environmental behavior intention, environmental moral exerts little influence on environmental behavior intention, whereas environmental responsibility is not significant. Finally, some theoretical conclusions about model analysis are summarized.