河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2009年
12期
103~106
,共null页
水生野生动物 所有权 制度重构
水生野生動物 所有權 製度重構
수생야생동물 소유권 제도중구
aquatic wild animals ; ownership ; system reconstruction
我国现行立法对水生野生动物所有权规定,存在着内涵不明确,外延不周延,立法规范与实践相背离等方面的问题。国外的立法实践可为我国的立法完善提供参考思路;突破传统的物权客体理论需要理念革新;明确界定水生野生动物的所有权具有重要的制度价值。我国对水生野生动物的所有权结构应具有多元性;权利主体的权利行使方式应有所限制。
我國現行立法對水生野生動物所有權規定,存在著內涵不明確,外延不週延,立法規範與實踐相揹離等方麵的問題。國外的立法實踐可為我國的立法完善提供參攷思路;突破傳統的物權客體理論需要理唸革新;明確界定水生野生動物的所有權具有重要的製度價值。我國對水生野生動物的所有權結構應具有多元性;權利主體的權利行使方式應有所限製。
아국현행입법대수생야생동물소유권규정,존재착내함불명학,외연불주연,입법규범여실천상배리등방면적문제。국외적입법실천가위아국적입법완선제공삼고사로;돌파전통적물권객체이론수요이념혁신;명학계정수생야생동물적소유권구유중요적제도개치。아국대수생야생동물적소유권결구응구유다원성;권리주체적권리행사방식응유소한제。
There are many problems on current provisions of ownership system of aquatic wild animals, for its ambiguous conception and range, the conflict between legislation and practice, etc. The alien legislation examples provide some useful information for us to improve our legislation. We need to change our traditional perspective of the object theory of ownership. The definite confines of the ownership of aquatic wild animals consists of some special system values. We should construct multiform ownership system for aquatic wild animals, and the exertion methods of the ownership should be restricted.