CAJ | 학술논문

冷战结束后，全球治理问题日益引起国际社会的广泛关注，全球治理理论的兴起与全球化进程深入发展的现实和全球秩序的变革密切相关。全球治理是一个内涵丰富而又颇存争议的概念，现实主义、新自由主义、建构主义和批判理论等从自己的视角出发进行理论解读，但它们都只是提供了一个理解的方面。目前，全球治理模式主要分为国家中心治理模式、有限领域治理模式、网络治理模式、国内一国外边疆治理模式以及欧盟“合作性世界秩序”治理模式，这些模式同样不具有普遍性，在适用范围和解释力上存在各自的局限。
랭전결속후，전구치리문제일익인기국제사회적엄범관주，전구치리이론적흥기여전구화진정심입발전적현실화전구질서적변혁밀절상관。전구치리시일개내함봉부이우파존쟁의적개념，현실주의、신자유주의、건구주의화비판이론등종자기적시각출발진행이론해독，단타문도지시제공료일개리해적방면。목전，전구치리모식주요분위국가중심치리모식、유한영역치리모식、망락치리모식、국내일국외변강치리모식이급구맹“합작성세계질서”치리모식，저사모식동양불구유보편성，재괄용범위화해석력상존재각자적국한。
After the Cold War, global governance has been increasingly paid widely attention by international society, the rise of global governance theory is closely related to the process of globalizafion and the change of global order. Global governance is a concept which not only includes rich connotations, but also is greatly disputable. Realism, neo- liberalism, constructionalism and critical theory analyze global governance from their own perspective. However, each of them just provides one of aspects of understanding. Currently, the patterns of global governance mainly involve the mode of national states as central actor, the governance of limited fields, network governance, domestic- international frontier governance and European Union ＂cooperative world order＂ governance. All of these patterns are not universal, each has respective limitation in the sphere of application and strengths of explanation.