CAJ | 학술논문

采用一般go no-go范式和BPD症状词为呈现内容的go no—go范式．以31名BPD大学生为被试，探讨情绪加工对其行为抑制控制功能的影响。结果表明，BPD组的反应时在一般范式中与正常对照组没有明显差别，但在情绪范式中出现明显延长，且明显长于一般范式中的反应时间；两个任务中，BPD组的错误执行个数均明显高于正常对照，且在情绪范式中有所增加。这揭示了BPD大学生的行为抑制控制功能可能存在一定缺陷，且在情绪干扰下，这种缺陷表现的相对明显。
채용일반go no-go범식화BPD증상사위정현내용적go no—go범식．이31명BPD대학생위피시，탐토정서가공대기행위억제공제공능적영향。결과표명，BPD조적반응시재일반범식중여정상대조조몰유명현차별，단재정서범식중출현명현연장，차명현장우일반범식중적반응시간；량개임무중，BPD조적착오집행개수균명현고우정상대조，차재정서범식중유소증가。저게시료BPD대학생적행위억제공제공능가능존재일정결함，차재정서간우하，저충결함표현적상대명현。
This study explored borderline personality disorder＇s inhibitory control deficits and the effect of emotion processing on it. 31 university students with BPD were diagnosed by PDQ ＋ 4and PDI-IV, then they and 31 normal students were assessed with a general go-no-go paradigm and an emotional go-no-go paradigm. The results demonstrated that the reaction times of the BPD group was shorter than that of the control group in the general paradigm, but there was no difference between the two groups; however, the reaction time of BPD subjects was markedly longer than that of the control in the emotional paradigm,and the time in the emotional paradigm was also longer than in the general paradigm. The results also demonstrated that the number of errors of BPD subjects was markedly bigger than the control in the two paradigms,and it was also bigger in emotional paradigm. The results suggested that there were some students with BPD in China, and they displayed a certain extent of inhibitory control deficits especially when processing emotional regulation.