河北法学
河北法學
하북법학
Hebei Law Science
2010年
1期
184~189
,共null页
民事公益诉讼 检察监督权 督促起诉权
民事公益訴訟 檢察鑑督權 督促起訴權
민사공익소송 검찰감독권 독촉기소권
civil action of public interest; prosecutorial supervision power; the right of urging bring an action
在民事公益诉讼中，检察机关作为原告、当事人或支持起诉者参与诉讼，检察监督权相应地便有不同性质的权利定位。反思检察监督权的不同定位，认为督促起诉权是检察监督权的题中之义与理性选择，并论述检察机关督促起诉权配置的现实需要、法律定位和范围。
在民事公益訴訟中，檢察機關作為原告、噹事人或支持起訴者參與訴訟，檢察鑑督權相應地便有不同性質的權利定位。反思檢察鑑督權的不同定位，認為督促起訴權是檢察鑑督權的題中之義與理性選擇，併論述檢察機關督促起訴權配置的現實需要、法律定位和範圍。
재민사공익소송중，검찰궤관작위원고、당사인혹지지기소자삼여소송，검찰감독권상응지편유불동성질적권리정위。반사검찰감독권적불동정위，인위독촉기소권시검찰감독권적제중지의여이성선택，병논술검찰궤관독촉기소권배치적현실수요、법률정위화범위。
Prosecutorial organs take part in the civil actions of public interest as plaintiff, litigant, party supporting prosecution. So the prosecutorial supervision power has different definition correspondingly. Reflecting the different definition of proseeutorial supervision power, the author thinks that the right of urging bring an action is the rational choice. This paper discusses the practical need, legal definition and limit of configuration the right of urging bring an action.
