现代法学
現代法學
현대법학
Modern Law Science
2010年
1期
148~158
,共null页
强制拍卖 公信力 利益权衡 执行异议 异议之诉
彊製拍賣 公信力 利益權衡 執行異議 異議之訴
강제박매 공신력 이익권형 집행이의 이의지소
mandatory auction ; public credit ; balance of benefits ; execution objection ; objection action
依据不同的强制拍卖性质学说,错误拍卖第三人财产的法律效力有所不同。从拍定人与第三人之间的利益权衡来看,“私法说”和“公法说”均有所失衡。强制拍卖的性质上应采用“公法说”,拍定人系原始取得拍卖物的所有权,这是维护公益、保障拍卖公信力之所需,但是,全面采用“公法说”并不符合我国国情。它有过分保护拍定人利益而牺牲第三人利益之虞。我国应当在坚持采用“公法说”的前提下,对“公法说”进行局部修正.以合理协调拍定人与第三人之间的利益关系。
依據不同的彊製拍賣性質學說,錯誤拍賣第三人財產的法律效力有所不同。從拍定人與第三人之間的利益權衡來看,“私法說”和“公法說”均有所失衡。彊製拍賣的性質上應採用“公法說”,拍定人繫原始取得拍賣物的所有權,這是維護公益、保障拍賣公信力之所需,但是,全麵採用“公法說”併不符閤我國國情。它有過分保護拍定人利益而犧牲第三人利益之虞。我國應噹在堅持採用“公法說”的前提下,對“公法說”進行跼部脩正.以閤理協調拍定人與第三人之間的利益關繫。
의거불동적강제박매성질학설,착오박매제삼인재산적법률효력유소불동。종박정인여제삼인지간적이익권형래간,“사법설”화“공법설”균유소실형。강제박매적성질상응채용“공법설”,박정인계원시취득박매물적소유권,저시유호공익、보장박매공신력지소수,단시,전면채용“공법설”병불부합아국국정。타유과분보호박정인이익이희생제삼인이익지우。아국응당재견지채용“공법설”적전제하,대“공법설”진행국부수정.이합리협조박정인여제삼인지간적이익관계。
The legal effects of false mandatory auction of the third party' s property differ under different doctrines. In term s of balance of the interests of bidder and the third party, neither public law doctrine nor private law doctrine seems entirely satisfactory The nature of mandatory auction should be determined under public law and the bidder be deemed to have acquired the ownership originally, which is considered necessary to protect public interests and preserve public credit of auction. However, overall adaptation of public law doctrine is by no means consistent with China' s special situation, which may lead to overprotection of the bidder and sacrifice the interest of the third party. While maintaining public law doctrine, we should partially improve it so as to adequately balance the interests of the bidder and the third party.