考古学报
攷古學報
고고학보
Acta Archaeologlca Sinica
2010年
1期
1~20
,共null页
西辽河流域 环境研究 史前时期 聚落 全球气候变化 考古学文化 生态脆弱地带 人类生存方式
西遼河流域 環境研究 史前時期 聚落 全毬氣候變化 攷古學文化 生態脆弱地帶 人類生存方式
서료하류역 배경연구 사전시기 취락 전구기후변화 고고학문화 생태취약지대 인류생존방식
西辽河流域地处北纬41—45度、东经118—124度,包括由西辽河干流以及西拉木伦河、老哈河、教来河等主要支流汇成的区域,此外乌尔吉木伦河在特大洪水期也能进入西辽河,基于这一原因,人们也将这里视为西辽河流域。西辽河流域属于中国北方生态脆弱地带,史前时期这里不仅经历着大暖期至大暖期结束气候转冷的全球变化过程,而且先后出现了兴隆洼、赵宝沟、红山、富河、小河沿、夏家店下层、夏家店上层等考古学文化。以聚落为基础,存在于各考古学文化间环境适应方式的异同,不仅取决于人类生存方式,也与全球气候变化直接关联,因此,通过聚落选址与人类活动方式获取环境信息成为本文重要思考与研究的内容。有关这些问题的研究,学术界已取得很多成果,对笔者具有重要启示。本文拟重点探讨史前时期西辽河流域聚落的环境选择与人地关系。
西遼河流域地處北緯41—45度、東經118—124度,包括由西遼河榦流以及西拉木倫河、老哈河、教來河等主要支流彙成的區域,此外烏爾吉木倫河在特大洪水期也能進入西遼河,基于這一原因,人們也將這裏視為西遼河流域。西遼河流域屬于中國北方生態脆弱地帶,史前時期這裏不僅經歷著大暖期至大暖期結束氣候轉冷的全毬變化過程,而且先後齣現瞭興隆窪、趙寶溝、紅山、富河、小河沿、夏傢店下層、夏傢店上層等攷古學文化。以聚落為基礎,存在于各攷古學文化間環境適應方式的異同,不僅取決于人類生存方式,也與全毬氣候變化直接關聯,因此,通過聚落選阯與人類活動方式穫取環境信息成為本文重要思攷與研究的內容。有關這些問題的研究,學術界已取得很多成果,對筆者具有重要啟示。本文擬重點探討史前時期西遼河流域聚落的環境選擇與人地關繫。
서료하류역지처북위41—45도、동경118—124도,포괄유서료하간류이급서랍목륜하、로합하、교래하등주요지류회성적구역,차외오이길목륜하재특대홍수기야능진입서료하,기우저일원인,인문야장저리시위서료하류역。서료하류역속우중국북방생태취약지대,사전시기저리불부경력착대난기지대난기결속기후전랭적전구변화과정,이차선후출현료흥륭와、조보구、홍산、부하、소하연、하가점하층、하가점상층등고고학문화。이취락위기출,존재우각고고학문화간배경괄응방식적이동,불부취결우인류생존방식,야여전구기후변화직접관련,인차,통과취락선지여인류활동방식획취배경신식성위본문중요사고여연구적내용。유관저사문제적연구,학술계이취득흔다성과,대필자구유중요계시。본문의중점탐토사전시기서료하류역취락적배경선택여인지관계。
The settlement is a product of the man-land relationship, and the selection of places for building settlements must satisfy the demand of human survival. In the Xinglongwa and Zhaobaogou cultures (a. 8000--6000 BP), people made a living mainly by gathering, fishing and hunting, and their settlements were located within the boundary of timberland suitable to those economic activities. Investigation shows that these settlements were largely concentrated on hill-slopes at a height of 400--600 m above sea level, while the mountain summits and river valleys beyond the limits played a part in this respect only during certain periods. Meanwhile, the West Liaohe River valley was one of the birthplaces of civilization. In the Hongshan and Upper Xiajiadian cultures (a. 6000--3000 BP), the weather was becoming cold and dry, primitive agriculture increased its proportion in the means of subsistence, and the population grew step by step, all of which caused the distribution of settlements to be expanded from timberland to lower grassland. In the Hongshan culture,farming began to play the leading role, whereas by the Upper Xiajiadian period, it had been supplemented by animal husbandry. Every change in the mode of man~s getting food was embodied in the relationship between the settlement and the environment: Gathering, fishing and hunting were entirely dependent on natural environment; the agriculture' s joining in decreased man's dependence on the natural world; and the breakthrough in the selection of the environment of settlements by expanding living space from timberland was just a result of promotion by agricultural production. Both the duration of settlement function and the alteration of settlement culture prove that the man-land relationship in the prehistoric West Liaohe River valley was kept in a state of relative balance. Either gathering, fishing and hunting in the Xinglongwa and Zhaobaogou cultures or agricultural production from the Hongshan period did not break through the environmental content of this region. The gathering, fishing and hunting economy of the Xinglongwa and Zhaobaogou periods made the functioning duration of settlements shorter than that in the Hongshan period and after when agriculture had held the leading position in economy. This suggests that, as exploiting economy and productive one were different in the rate of dependence on natural environment, with the settlement as the base, man's influence on environment was varied in time scale.