CAJ | 학술논문

在中国对美国部分汽车和鸡肉产品已经发起“双反调查”（反倾销和反补贴调查的同时进行）的情况下，根据《SCM协定》规定的补贴定义，严格考察我国《反补贴条例》所规定的补贴定义与国际法规定的一致性，指出后者的错误所在，建议将其修正为“补贴是一个国家的政府和公共机构通过提供财政资助为接受者所带来的利益”。
재중국대미국부분기차화계육산품이경발기“쌍반조사”（반경소화반보첩조사적동시진행）적정황하，근거《SCM협정》규정적보첩정의，엄격고찰아국《반보첩조례》소규정적보첩정의여국제법규정적일치성，지출후자적착오소재，건의장기수정위“보첩시일개국가적정부화공공궤구통과제공재정자조위접수자소대래적이익”。
Under the situation of the investigations of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy launched by China against part of automobiles and chicken products exported from the United States, the author conscientiously analyzes the definition of subsidy formulated in China＇s Anti-subsidy Regulations and discovers the inconsistency between it and the subsidy definition provided in SCM Agreement. In conclusion, the author points out the mistake and suggests subsidy be considered as the benefits brought to the recipients through financial contribution of the government or public institutions.