CAJ | 학술논문

在分类理论观的基础上,本研究在目标匹配范式下,使用可以表示一定概念的现实物体或场景的图片材料,通过眼动记录法对分类加工过程的分离,考察了40名创造能力不同的中学生分类加工过程的差异。结果表明,在首次加工阶段,创造能力高和低的被试均先对目标类别概念进行加工,然后再对选项区的待分类概念进行加工。创造能力高的被试更多地使用概括性的加工策略完成任务并表现出加工的有效性,创造能力低的被试更多地使用比较性的加工策略表现出加工的无效性。在再加工阶段,高和低创造能力的被试将加工的重点放在待分类概念上。创造能力低的被试通过概括和比较的策略完成任务。
재분류이론관적기출상,본연구재목표필배범식하,사용가이표시일정개념적현실물체혹장경적도편재료,통과안동기록법대분류가공과정적분리,고찰료40명창조능력불동적중학생분류가공과정적차이。결과표명,재수차가공계단,창조능력고화저적피시균선대목표유별개념진행가공,연후재대선항구적대분류개념진행가공。창조능력고적피시경다지사용개괄성적가공책략완성임무병표현출가공적유효성,창조능력저적피시경다지사용비교성적가공책략표현출가공적무효성。재재가공계단,고화저창조능력적피시장가공적중점방재대분류개념상。창조능력저적피시통과개괄화비교적책략완성임무。
Theory-based view makes a point of knowledge in category learning and is different with similarity-based view which emphasizes the prototype or exemplar models.There are two main differences between them：the relationship of concepts and the relationship of characters within a concept.Both of them can be explained by the theory-based view,but can not by the similarity-based view.So this study basing on theory-based view and investigated the eye movement differences in category processing between high and low creativity students.Pictures showing reality things or scenes were used in the Target-matching model in the experiment.Forty middle school participants were divide into two group：high or low creativity group.They were asked to choose two pictures that can be classified to the target conception category in the question area from the answer area.The researchers separated two processing period：the first process period and the second process period,and Eye-tracking method was used to record the subjects＇ eye fixation data （fixation duration,fixation number,pupil diameter,etc） in the whole experiment.The researchers compared the high creativity group and the low creativity group students with their eye fixation data and found that,in the first process period,the high creativity students processed more on the target conceptions than the classified conceptions,and fixed more on the correct answers than the false ones.There was opposite and non-significant difference between the two kinds of the conceptions in the low creativity group.In the second process period there was more process on the classified conceptions than the target conceptions in both group.The low creativity students processed more on the correct answers than the false ones,the difference was not significant in the high creativity group.In the whole process period,both high and low creativity students processed more on the classified conceptions,but the difference was more significant in the low creativity group.Both high and low creativity students processed more on the correct answers,but the difference was more significant in the high creativity group.Using eye-tracking method,the researchers make a point of processing duration,finding that though had the same choice,the high and low creativity students had different process.It is obviously that the study of classification should pay attention not only to the result but also to the information processing,and the eye tracking method play an important role in it..