CAJ | 학술논문

当代对科学的反思主要有三种取向,即捍卫科学的辩护,质疑科学的批判,以及省视科学的审度。为科学辩护与批判科学的倾向往往在激烈较量中趋向极端,这种畸形的局面终于导致向所谓审度立场的转换。审度为全面、深入地认识科学提供了一条恰当路径;尤其对那些易于在两极间摇摆、迫切需要真正树立科学精神的国人,这种清醒的科学反思是当下极为合适的选择。
당대대과학적반사주요유삼충취향,즉한위과학적변호,질의과학적비판,이급성시과학적심도。위과학변호여비판과학적경향왕왕재격렬교량중추향겁단,저충기형적국면종우도치향소위심도립장적전환。심도위전면、심입지인식과학제공료일조흡당로경;우기대나사역우재량겁간요파、박절수요진정수립과학정신적국인,저충청성적과학반사시당하겁위합괄적선택。
In the contemporary era,there are mainly three different orientations of reflection on science,namely,defense to advocate science,criticism to question science,and reconsideration to examine science.In the course of intensified contests,the tendencies of defending science and criticizing science are apt to go to extremes.This abnormal situation may eventually lead to a conversion to the position of the so called reconsideration.Reconsideration provides a proper way for a comprehensive and thorough understanding of science.It is especially appropriate for those Chinese who tend to vacillate between the two extremes and are in urgent need to establish a scientific spirit.