CAJ | 학술논문

人们历来重视对《毛传》“标兴”的认识，却很少关注《郑笺》对《毛传》“标兴”的认识和发展。《郑笺》的这种认识和发展在形式上表现为对部分《毛传》“标兴”之诗不作兴体解，增加新的比兴诗和在注解上大量突破《毛传》一诗只标一处“兴也”；而实质上则表现为一是郑玄理解的“兴”的内涵与毛公有了一定的改变，二是郑玄将“兴”作为一种注释的体例较毛公有了发展和完善，言语上的用诗之“兴”正式转变成了文学上的创作之“兴”，以“兴”作为诗的一种作法和表现手法的阐释理论得以确立。
인문력래중시대《모전》“표흥”적인식，각흔소관주《정전》대《모전》“표흥”적인식화발전。《정전》적저충인식화발전재형식상표현위대부분《모전》“표흥”지시불작흥체해，증가신적비흥시화재주해상대량돌파《모전》일시지표일처“흥야”；이실질상칙표현위일시정현리해적“흥”적내함여모공유료일정적개변，이시정현장“흥”작위일충주석적체례교모공유료발전화완선，언어상적용시지“흥”정식전변성료문학상적창작지“흥”，이“흥”작위시적일충작법화표현수법적천석이론득이학립。
Mao Heng＇s annotation of Shijing （《诗经》） and his commentary on the styhstic device of Xing （兴） in particular, has long received wide attention, while little attention was given to Zheng Xuan＇s acknowledgement and development of Mao＇s commentary on Xing. Based on Mao＇s recognition of Xing in Shijing, Zheng developed his own criterion to identify the very stylistic device in this great ancient Chinese classic： some such devices identified by Mao are denied and some ignored or omitted by Mao are added not only quan- titatively but also qualitatively. Another contribution made by Zheng is that he promoted Xing from a simple linguistic device to an effective literary device, thus establishing the hermeneutic theory of Xing as an essential literary device created by Shijing.