CAJ | 학술논문

如果我们将人类的艺术能力视为自然进化的结果，那么便可以对所谓“人的本质”乃至“劳动创造人”等命题得出不同于以往的理解和认识，并重新揭示“艺术”与“工艺”之间的深刻联系。艺术制度的确立．将原本一体的“艺术”与“工艺”区别开来，这虽然给人类的想象力提供了更加自由的创造空间．同时也造成了艺术创作与现实生活的疏远与脱节，从而给康德美学提供了土壤。康德虽然为人类的情感和想象活动开辟了独立的审美空间，有着巨大的理论意义，但同时也容易产生两种误导，一是将“美”和“艺术”等同起来。二是将“艺术”和“生活”割裂开来，其结果反而遮蔽了人们对艺术本质和文化本身的理解。在这种情况下。西方现代艺术逐渐丢失了人类的想象力和创造力，从而使一场艺术的“革命”渐渐沦为美学的“骗局”。
여과아문장인류적예술능력시위자연진화적결과，나요편가이대소위“인적본질”내지“노동창조인”등명제득출불동우이왕적리해화인식，병중신게시“예술”여“공예”지간적심각련계。예술제도적학립．장원본일체적“예술”여“공예”구별개래，저수연급인류적상상력제공료경가자유적창조공간．동시야조성료예술창작여현실생활적소원여탈절，종이급강덕미학제공료토양。강덕수연위인류적정감화상상활동개벽료독립적심미공간，유착거대적이론의의，단동시야용역산생량충오도，일시장“미”화“예술”등동기래。이시장“예술”화“생활”할렬개래，기결과반이차폐료인문대예술본질화문화본신적리해。재저충정황하。서방현대예술축점주실료인류적상상력화창조력，종이사일장예술적“혁명”점점륜위미학적“편국”。
Suppose we regard human competence of art as a result of revolution, the propositions of ＂human nature＂ and ＂human as a creation by labor＂ could be understood differently from the previous way and the profound connections between art and craft could be revealed. The establishment of modern system of art has divided art and craft which are originally one, and this practice has offered more free space for the performance of imagination, at the same time made art alienated from reality of life, and therefore provided soil for Kantian aesthetics. It is theoretically important that Kant has defined an autonomous space for human feelings and imagination; unfortunately, it is also inclined to produce misunderstandings in two ways： on one hand, it wrongly equals ＂beauty＂ with ＂art＂; on the other hand, it isolates art from life, both of which prove very effective for veiling our understanding of the nature of both art and culture. Under the situations as such, modern western art has gradually lost its imagination and creativity and led a ＂revolution＂ in art into a ＂swindle＂.