CAJ | 학술논문

就当前共和国新闻史的状况看，其最大的问题就是“编年史”的思维，即按照时间顺序，依照已有的结论按次排列所谓的大事，无有研究者自身的理解和分析，带来的最大后果，是研究者失去了自己的提问能力。就客观上而言，此种现象与新闻事业同党和国家的关系密切有关，但从主观看，无疑也有“决定论”的科学史观之影响。
취당전공화국신문사적상황간，기최대적문제취시“편년사”적사유，즉안조시간순서，의조이유적결론안차배렬소위적대사，무유연구자자신적리해화분석，대래적최대후과，시연구자실거료자기적제문능력。취객관상이언，차충현상여신문사업동당화국가적관계밀절유관，단종주관간，무의야유“결정론”적과학사관지영향。
The biggest problem of the historiography of Journalism since 1949 is its ＂Chronicle＂ paradigm. That is arranging those so-called great events in chronological order in accordance with the given conclusions, without the researchers＂ own understanding and analysis. The most serious consequence is that the researchers have lost their ability to pose questions. This phenomenon, on the objective aspect, is related to the close relation between the journalism and the Party and state; On the subjective aspect, there is no doubt that it has been affected by the scientific view of history of ＂Determinism＂.