CAJ | 학술논문

爱因斯坦与哥本哈根学派关于量子力学完备性的争论引发了科学界和科学哲学界的大讨论。在这场争论背后,对于＂因果决定论＂的理解是一个非常重要的哲学问题。本文通过对科学知识社会学学派和新经验主义学派的两个重要人物——布鲁尔和卡特赖特关于因果性与决定论的探讨,阐述了对于因果关系与决定论及其关系的新理解,得出了他们从不同进路否定了＂因果关系＂与＂决定论＂之间的简单对应关系的结论。对于我们重新认识量子力学的争论以及从方法论上把握科学认识活动中的确定性与不确定性、有限性与无限性的辩证关系提供了新的思路。
애인사탄여가본합근학파관우양자역학완비성적쟁론인발료과학계화과학철학계적대토론。재저장쟁론배후,대우＂인과결정론＂적리해시일개비상중요적철학문제。본문통과대과학지식사회학학파화신경험주의학파적량개중요인물——포로이화잡특뢰특관우인과성여결정론적탐토,천술료대우인과관계여결정론급기관계적신리해,득출료타문종불동진로부정료＂인과관계＂여＂결정론＂지간적간단대응관계적결론。대우아문중신인식양자역학적쟁론이급종방법론상파악과학인식활동중적학정성여불학정성、유한성여무한성적변증관계제공료신적사로。
The debate about the maturity of quantum mechanics between Einstein and Copenhagen school has aroused the durative controversy in science and philosophy of science fields.The understanding of ＂theory of causal determination＂ is a very important philosophy problem behind this debate.This paper tries to analyse the causality and determination of the ideas of Bloor and Cartwright who belong to the sociology and science knowledge and new empiricism schools separately.And it deals with the new understandings of causality relation and determination from the sociology of scientific knowledge and scientific philosophy dimensionalities.Then it concludes that they negatived the simple parallelism relation between causality and determination from different approaches.Furthermore it provides us with new methods to understand the debate about quantum mechanics and to hold the dialectical relationship between certainty and uncertainty,finiteness and infiniteness about the scientific activities in the perspective of methodology.