CAJ | 학술논문

采用经典Posner实验范式，对大学生在内外源提示和无提示下的选择性注意进行了眼动研究。实验结果表明：当内源线索提示有效性比例较高时，女性表现出较大的提示效度效应；在外源线索提示下，男女表现差异不明显；在无线索提示下，女性表现出无效线索提示的损失，而男性表现出无效线索提示的获益。研究的初步结论是男女在视觉选择性注意的某些方面存在着差异。
채용경전Posner실험범식，대대학생재내외원제시화무제시하적선택성주의진행료안동연구。실험결과표명：당내원선색제시유효성비례교고시，녀성표현출교대적제시효도효응；재외원선색제시하，남녀표현차이불명현；재무선색제시하，녀성표현출무효선색제시적손실，이남성표현출무효선색제시적획익。연구적초보결론시남녀재시각선택성주의적모사방면존재착차이。
A classical cue paradigm was employed to examine the differences between male and female college students under the endogenous and exogenous cue and non-cue in visual selective attention with the equipment of EYELINK II. The results were that under the conditions of high endogenous cue predictivity, validity effects were found in all subjects; Females showed greater validity effects in the endogenously cued tasks, but not in the peripheral cued tasks; There was no difference of response time in the exogenous cued tasks. Further more, we found that while females showed loss from an invalid cue relative to a no-cue control condition, males showed gains from invalid cues compared to no-cue control conditions. The preliminary conclusion is that in terms of visual selective attention there is a difference between mades and females.