CAJ | 학술논문

趋利避害是生物体最基本的特征之一，人类的某些“趋害”行为质疑了这一本能说。研究发现，对经历的回顾性评价是由经历中具有特殊性质的片断通过加权平均所决定。研究从探索起决定性作用的片断展开，涉及的领域逐渐扩大。该文着重介绍了峰值一结尾规则及持续时问忽略等发现，并指出减少实验误差，拓宽应用领域，扩展对有利刺激序列的研究是该领域未来主要的研究方向。
추리피해시생물체최기본적특정지일，인류적모사“추해”행위질의료저일본능설。연구발현，대경력적회고성평개시유경력중구유특수성질적편단통과가권평균소결정。연구종탐색기결정성작용적편단전개，섭급적영역축점확대。해문착중개소료봉치일결미규칙급지속시문홀략등발현，병지출감소실험오차，탁관응용영역，확전대유리자격서렬적연구시해영역미래주요적연구방향。
That positive utilities are to be approached and negative utilities are to be avoided is one of the inherent instincts of organisms. However, such a view is sometimes challenged by human positive-utility-appraching behaviors. Accumulated evidences suggest that decisions are often controlled by global retrospective evaluations of relevant experiences, which appear to be dominated bothby a weighted average of some salient pieces and the specific features of experiences, which have drawn research attention in specific fields for years. Three significant findings （i. e., peak-end rule, duration neglect and violations of monotonicity） are presented in this paper. Theoretical and practical implications are developed and discussed.