CAJ | 학술논문

实验采用《FMMU变态人格危险性评估问卷》和内隐联想测验分别测量激情犯和累惯犯的外显和内隐暴力态度,探讨激情犯和累惯犯外显和内隐暴力态度特点及预测特征。研究发现,激情犯和累惯犯的外显态度有显著差异,但是内隐态度未见显著差异。由于部分罪犯在内隐态度中出现反转效应,将激情犯和累惯犯分为激情犯未反转组和反转组,累惯犯未反转组和反转组,这四个组都产生了显著的IAT效应,并且每个组的外显态度和内隐态度都发生了分离。从结果可见即使是同一犯罪类型,犯罪时都实施了暴力行为,但暴力态度却有差异。在测量外显暴力态度的基础上,结合内隐暴力态度的测量,将细化犯罪人分类,为不同特点的犯罪人实施不同的改造和处遇方案提供新的思路。
실험채용《FMMU변태인격위험성평고문권》화내은련상측험분별측량격정범화루관범적외현화내은폭력태도,탐토격정범화루관범외현화내은폭력태도특점급예측특정。연구발현,격정범화루관범적외현태도유현저차이,단시내은태도미견현저차이。유우부분죄범재내은태도중출현반전효응,장격정범화루관범분위격정범미반전조화반전조,루관범미반전조화반전조,저사개조도산생료현저적IAT효응,병차매개조적외현태도화내은태도도발생료분리。종결과가견즉사시동일범죄류형,범죄시도실시료폭역행위,단폭력태도각유차이。재측량외현폭력태도적기출상,결합내은폭력태도적측량,장세화범죄인분류,위불동특점적범죄인실시불동적개조화처우방안제공신적사로。
With the persistent growth of the crime rate,crime prevention has been recently raised again as a hot field.Evaluation of violent risk is an affective way to prevent crime and violent attitude is one of the most important factors involved in this kind of research.Violent attitude,as an object of attitude,has a structure composed of explicit and implicit facet.Traditionally,the explicit attitude was the focus that people used to evaluate,but we could not reveal the essential of violent attitude and the results will affect the validity of violence prevention as well.The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of explicit and implicit violent attitude of passionate criminals and recidivists based on the methods of explicit measurement and implicit measurement respectively,and to discuss violent attitude from a different point of view.One hundred and twenty-three male criminals （53 passionate criminals and 70 recidivists） were involved in this study.The explicit violent attitude was assessed using the FMMU Abnormal Personality Risk Factors Inventory （FMMU-APRI）,whereas the implicit violent attitude was measured using Implicit Attitude Test （IAT）.The data was analyzed in SPSS 13.0 and the t-test and the correlation coefficient were considered.First,the results showed that there was a significant difference between the score of FMMU-APRI in passionate criminals and that of recidivists,but no IAT effect was found within each group which was probably covered by a ＂reversed＂ effect.Then,we divided the passionate criminals group into two sub-groups according to the appearance of ＂reversed＂ effect,reversed group （reversed group of passionate criminals,RG-PC） and non-reversed group （NRG-PC）.In the same way,we got RG-R （reversed group of recidivists） and NRG-R（non-reversed group of recidivists）.The IAT effect was all observed within these four sub-groups.Next,the score of FMMU-APRI of four sub-groups were compared with the norm.The results showed that NRG-PC and NRG-R got the significant higher score than the norm,and no difference was found in the other two groups when compared with the norm.So,we found the disassociation phenomena between explicit violent attitude and implicit violent attitude of passionate criminals as well as recidivists.Passionate criminals and recidivists have the same behaviors which have already offended the law,but their violent attitudes are not the same.And,even the same type of criminals also has the different violent attitudes.So,we suggest that we should catalogue the criminals not only based on their explicit offensive behavior,but also on their implicit violent attitude,and also consider the individuality to rebuild the criminals as well.