法学研究
法學研究
법학연구
Cass Journal of Law
2010年
3期
149~162
,共null页
商标 商标确权 注册 使用
商標 商標確權 註冊 使用
상표 상표학권 주책 사용
trademark, right verification, registration, use
在第一性的意义上,商标权无疑源于企业在交易活动中对商标的实际使用。这一论断既可从商标制度演进的历史中得到验证,又契合财产权劳动学说和符号学基本原理。尽管如此,各主要国家都先后建立了商标注册制度,并由此形成商标权注册取得和使用取得两种确权模式。无论采取何种模式,各国商标法乃至国际公约都作了充分的技术设计,致力于寻求注册和使用在法律效力上的合理平衡。我国现行商标法采取一种近乎绝对的注册取得确权模式,在客观上助长了商标抢注行为,导致大量注册商标与市场实际脱节,影响了商标制度的正常运行。应在总体上沿袭注册取得传统模式的同时,明确规定基于使用也可取得商标权,并依此对商标法进行修订。
在第一性的意義上,商標權無疑源于企業在交易活動中對商標的實際使用。這一論斷既可從商標製度縯進的歷史中得到驗證,又契閤財產權勞動學說和符號學基本原理。儘管如此,各主要國傢都先後建立瞭商標註冊製度,併由此形成商標權註冊取得和使用取得兩種確權模式。無論採取何種模式,各國商標法迺至國際公約都作瞭充分的技術設計,緻力于尋求註冊和使用在法律效力上的閤理平衡。我國現行商標法採取一種近乎絕對的註冊取得確權模式,在客觀上助長瞭商標搶註行為,導緻大量註冊商標與市場實際脫節,影響瞭商標製度的正常運行。應在總體上沿襲註冊取得傳統模式的同時,明確規定基于使用也可取得商標權,併依此對商標法進行脩訂。
재제일성적의의상,상표권무의원우기업재교역활동중대상표적실제사용。저일론단기가종상표제도연진적역사중득도험증,우계합재산권노동학설화부호학기본원리。진관여차,각주요국가도선후건립료상표주책제도,병유차형성상표권주책취득화사용취득량충학권모식。무론채취하충모식,각국상표법내지국제공약도작료충분적기술설계,치력우심구주책화사용재법률효력상적합리평형。아국현행상표법채취일충근호절대적주책취득학권모식,재객관상조장료상표창주행위,도치대량주책상표여시장실제탈절,영향료상표제도적정상운행。응재총체상연습주책취득전통모식적동시,명학규정기우사용야가취득상표권,병의차대상표법진행수정。
As one pair of the most important concepts in trademark system, registration and use play key roles in trademark right verification. How to deal with the relationship between them and balance their legal effects are always the critical issues that all the countries have to confront with. Primarily, the trademark right originates from the actual use by enterprises in the com- merce. This can be verified by the historical evolution of trademark system, and is consistent with the theory of property--labor and the doctrine of semiotics. As most countries in the world have established trademark registration system, the trademark right is essentially acquired through ac- tual use or registration. However, the two models are not always opposite to each other. Even within the trademark law of the same model, the legal status of registration or use differs more or less from country to country. Whatever approach adopted, it is critical for all the countries to try to make a better bal- ance between registration and use. In the current world, there still exist differences between the two models, but nearly all the countries adopt a trademark right verification system with a com- promising character to some extent. As to the use model, while the trademark law still insists that trademark right originates from actual use, registration can play an important role in testif- ying and strengthening the trademark right. For the registration model, the law still adheres to the registration principle, while admits that trademark use could also result in legal right in order to overcome the by--effect of registration principle. The current trademark law of China adopts a kind of absolute registration model, and as a re- sult, the un--registered trademark can not be protected by law. As a solution, the legislature of China should revise and improve the trademark law by clearly stipulating that trademark right can also be acquired through actual use while following the traditional registration model. The current draft prepared by the SAIC pays too much attention on legal procedures, and neglects the essen- tial issue concerning the role of use in trademark right verification, therefore makes no substantive improvement.