CAJ | 학술논문

双重所有权是英关法信托制度中精巧的法律制度设计，但它与我国单一所有权理念格格不入。我国移植了信托制度，但没有妥善解决双重所有权的本土化问题，由此导致信托财产所有权归属模糊不清、受益权性质悬而未决、信托登记名存实亡。分析表明，是否采用双重所有权的形式并不重要，关键是本土化的制度设计能否实现同样的制度功能。在大陆法系的框架下，由受托人享有信托财产的单一所有权，同时受益人享有对受托人的债权请求权，这种设计既可以发挥信托制度的功能，又能够避免对我国传统物权制度造成巨大冲击，有助于实现信托制度的本土化。
쌍중소유권시영관법신탁제도중정교적법률제도설계，단타여아국단일소유권이념격격불입。아국이식료신탁제도，단몰유타선해결쌍중소유권적본토화문제，유차도치신탁재산소유권귀속모호불청、수익권성질현이미결、신탁등기명존실망。분석표명，시부채용쌍중소유권적형식병불중요，관건시본토화적제도설계능부실현동양적제도공능。재대륙법계적광가하，유수탁인향유신탁재산적단일소유권，동시수익인향유대수탁인적채권청구권，저충설계기가이발휘신탁제도적공능，우능구피면대아국전통물권제도조성거대충격，유조우실현신탁제도적본토화。
Dual ownership, a sophisticated devise in the Anglo-American trust law regime, differs greatly from Chinese absolute ownership. While transplanting trust law, China ignored to localize dual ownership, leaving problems behind such as who should be held as the owner of the trusted property and how the nature of the beneficiary right be determined. And trust registration is indeed of no function. The observation proves that it is of key importance to ensure the Sinolized regime can perform the same function rather than merely assume the form of double ownership. Within the framework of continental law, the trustee is vested absolute ownership of the trust property while the beneficiary has the creditor＇ s claim against the trustee, which may not only exercise the function of trust but also prevent China＇ s traditional real right system from being attacked so as to conduce to realization of localization of trust institution.