CAJ | 학술논문

我国知识产权法学界通说认为，《著作权法》所规定的修改权与保护作品完整权是一种权利的正反两个方面，如果按此理解，修改权委实没有独立存在的价值。然而，这是对修改权的误读，修改权的内容无法被保护作品完整权所涵盖，二者所保护的作者的精神利益是不同的，它最大的价值在于当作者思想和观点变化时得基于此项权利来维护作品与其思想、观点的一致性。
아국지식산권법학계통설인위，《저작권법》소규정적수개권여보호작품완정권시일충권리적정반량개방면，여과안차리해，수개권위실몰유독립존재적개치。연이，저시대수개권적오독，수개권적내용무법피보호작품완정권소함개，이자소보호적작자적정신이익시불동적，타최대적개치재우당작자사상화관점변화시득기우차항권리래유호작품여기사상、관점적일치성。
Much has been said in China＇ s intellectual property rights circle that the right to revise the work provided in the Copyright Act and the right to preserve the integrity of the work is two sides of one coin. As such, it seems meaningless to develop revision right separately, which, however, is . indeed a misunderstanding of the revision right. The right of integrity cannot enshrine the contents of the revision right. The moral interests protected by the two rights vary a great deal. Where the author＇ s ideas and points change, with the revision right, s/he can manage to maintain the work consistent with her/his ideas and points, which is deemed the highest value of the revision right.