西安交通大学学报:社会科学版
西安交通大學學報:社會科學版
서안교통대학학보:사회과학판
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
2010年
3期
7~11
,共null页
关系社会学 海外华人 民族关系 种族关系
關繫社會學 海外華人 民族關繫 種族關繫
관계사회학 해외화인 민족관계 충족관계
relational sociology; overseas Chinese; national relation; racial relation
用海外华人研究作为一个实例来解释关系社会学的创新观点从广义的角度理解关系社会学,研究社会是从社会关系出发,而不是从社会本质开始;以往研究海外华人有两种观点:第一种观点强调海外华人身上带着中国传统的血统,第二种观点是用种族的概念去理解海外华人,均强调文化本质和种族原始区别;从海外华人乡土观念和家族关系可以看到:民族关系的发展受到多方面关系的影响,包括海外华人与中国的关系以及与当地人的关系;此外,海外华人在外国成为一个种族不是基于华人本身的种族本质,而是由于海外华人与当地主流民族之间的不平等关系导致形成;进而描述了关系社会学一些值及探讨的问题。
用海外華人研究作為一箇實例來解釋關繫社會學的創新觀點從廣義的角度理解關繫社會學,研究社會是從社會關繫齣髮,而不是從社會本質開始;以往研究海外華人有兩種觀點:第一種觀點彊調海外華人身上帶著中國傳統的血統,第二種觀點是用種族的概唸去理解海外華人,均彊調文化本質和種族原始區彆;從海外華人鄉土觀唸和傢族關繫可以看到:民族關繫的髮展受到多方麵關繫的影響,包括海外華人與中國的關繫以及與噹地人的關繫;此外,海外華人在外國成為一箇種族不是基于華人本身的種族本質,而是由于海外華人與噹地主流民族之間的不平等關繫導緻形成;進而描述瞭關繫社會學一些值及探討的問題。
용해외화인연구작위일개실례래해석관계사회학적창신관점종엄의적각도리해관계사회학,연구사회시종사회관계출발,이불시종사회본질개시;이왕연구해외화인유량충관점:제일충관점강조해외화인신상대착중국전통적혈통,제이충관점시용충족적개념거리해해외화인,균강조문화본질화충족원시구별;종해외화인향토관념화가족관계가이간도:민족관계적발전수도다방면관계적영향,포괄해외화인여중국적관계이급여당지인적관계;차외,해외화인재외국성위일개충족불시기우화인본신적충족본질,이시유우해외화인여당지주류민족지간적불평등관계도치형성;진이묘술료관계사회학일사치급탐토적문제。
Using the research on overseas Chinese as an empirical case, this paper elucidates the innovative perspectives of relational sociology. This means that the relational sociology is comprehended from a broad viewpoint and the research of society starts with social relation instead of the essence of society. In the past, there have been two points of view for studying overseas Chinese. The first one stresses that overseas Chinese possess the traditional blood relationship, whereas the second one is to comprehend overseas Chinese with the racial concepts, both stressing the cultural essence and racial original distinction. From the native soil concepts and the ties with home clans of overseas Chinese, it can be seen that the development of national relationship is affected by multiple relationships, involving the relationship between overseas Chinese and China and that between overseas Chinese and host population. Moreover, the paper shows that the racialization of overseas Chinese in foreign states is not based on their own racial essence, but stems from the unequal relationship between overseas Chinese and the host society's mainstream nationalities. It then describes a few problems of relational sociology deserving exploration.